These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16470470)

  • 1. An evaluation of digital cellular handsets by hearing aid users.
    Kozma-Spytek L; Harkins J
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2005; 42(4 Suppl 2):145-56. PubMed ID: 16470470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Telecoil-mode hearing aid compatibility performance requirements for wireless and cordless handsets: magnetic signal levels.
    Julstrom S; Kozma-Spytek L; Isabelle S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Sep; 22(8):515-27. PubMed ID: 22031676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Telecoil-mode hearing aid compatibility performance requirements for wireless and cordless handsets: magnetic signal-to-noise.
    Julstrom S; Kozma-Spytek L; Isabelle S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Sep; 22(8):528-41. PubMed ID: 22031677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Subjective assessment of cochlear implant users' signal-to-noise ratio requirements for different levels of wireless device usability.
    Julstrom S; Kozma-Spytek L
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014; 25(10):952-68. PubMed ID: 25514448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hearing aid-compatible mobile handsets, petition of American National Standards Committee C63 (EMC) ANSO ASC C63 (TM). Final rule.
    Federal Communications Commission
    Fed Regist; 2008 May; 73(89):25566-91. PubMed ID: 18567173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hearing aid users benefit from induction loop when using digital cellular phones.
    Sorri M; Piiparinen P; Huttunen K; Haho M; Tobey E; Thibodeau L; Buckley K
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):119-32. PubMed ID: 12677109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Regulating hearing aid compatibility of cell phones: results from a national survey.
    Jones ML; Morris JT; Mueller JL; Lippincott B; Sweatman WM
    Assist Technol; 2020 Jul; 32(4):173-181. PubMed ID: 30332559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hearing aid electromagnetic interference from digital wireless telephones.
    Skopec M
    IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng; 1998 Jun; 6(2):235-9. PubMed ID: 9631332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electromagnetic interference of bone-anchored hearing aids by cellular phones revisited.
    Kompis M; Häusler R
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2002 Jul; 122(5):510-2. PubMed ID: 12206260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Australian experience: global system for mobile communications wireless telephones and hearing aids.
    Byrne D; Burwood E
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 Jun; 12(6):315-21. PubMed ID: 11440320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance characteristics for hearing aid microphone versus telephone and telephone/telecoil reception modes.
    Tannahill JC
    J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Jun; 26(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 6887805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of CDMA wireless phone power output and puncture rate on hearing aid interference levels.
    Fry TL; Schlegel RE; Grant H
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 2000; 34(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 10690434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electromagnetic interference of bone-anchored hearing aids by cellular phones.
    Kompis M; Negri S; Häusler R
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2000 Oct; 120(7):855-9. PubMed ID: 11132720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hearing Aid Compatibility Standards. Final rule; announcement of effective date.
    Federal Communications Commission
    Fed Regist; 2018 May; 83(98):23378-80. PubMed ID: 30019870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hearing Aid-Compatible Mobile Handsets. Final rule.
    Federal Communications Commission
    Fed Regist; 2016 Jan; 81(2):173-83. PubMed ID: 26742181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Wireless telephone-hearing aid electromagnetic compatibility research at the University of Oklahoma.
    Schlegel RE; Ravindran AR; Raman S; Grant H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 Jun; 12(6):301-8. PubMed ID: 11440318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Field measurements of electromagnetic interference in hearing aids.
    Levitt H; Harkins J; Singer B; Yeung E
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 Jun; 12(6):275-80. PubMed ID: 11440312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantifying the bystander-effect of 2.5G mobile telephones on the speech perception of digital hearing aid users.
    Vlastarakos PV; Nikolopoulos TP; Manolopoulos L; Stamou A; Halkiotis KK; Ferekidis E; Georgiou E
    B-ENT; 2012; 8(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 22896928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory Distraction and Acclimatization to Hearing Aids.
    Dawes P; Munro KJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):174-183. PubMed ID: 27564230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hearing aid and cellular telephone compatibility: working toward solutions.
    Berger HS
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 Jun; 12(6):309-14. PubMed ID: 11440319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.