These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

404 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16470506)

  • 1. Can non-randomized trials be considered to be equivalent to randomized trials in forensic mental health?
    Leese M
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2005; 15(2):121-2. PubMed ID: 16470506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can we obtain credible estimates of the causal effects of interventions from non-randomized trials (observational studies or so-called quasi-experiments)?
    Dunn G
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2005; 15(2):123-5. PubMed ID: 16470507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
    Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [How to develop evidence-based ophthalmology].
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Apr; 40(4):280-3. PubMed ID: 15268842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Therapeutic evaluation and the level of proof].
    Bouvenot G; Villani P; Bouvenot J; Ambrosi P
    Rev Prat; 2010 Sep; 60(7):1017-22. PubMed ID: 21033506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses.
    Moher D; Cook DJ; Jadad AR; Tugwell P; Moher M; Jones A; Pham B; Klassen TP
    Health Technol Assess; 1999; 3(12):i-iv, 1-98. PubMed ID: 10374081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The clinician as investigator: participating in clinical trials in the practice setting: Appendix 2: statistical concepts in study design and analysis.
    Lader EW; Cannon CP; Ohman EM; Newby LK; Sulmasy DP; Barst RJ; Fair JM; Flather M; Freedman JE; Frye RL; Hand MM; Jesse RL; Van de Werf F; Costa F;
    Circulation; 2004 Jun; 109(21):e305-7. PubMed ID: 15173053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The clinician as investigator: participating in clinical trials in the practice setting: Appendix 1: fundamentals of study design.
    Lader EW; Cannon CP; Ohman EM; Newby LK; Sulmasy DP; Barst RJ; Fair JM; Flather M; Freedman JE; Frye RL; Hand MM; Jesse RL; Van de Werf F; Costa F;
    Circulation; 2004 Jun; 109(21):e302-4. PubMed ID: 15173052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A step-by-step approach to the evaluation of clinical studies with therapeutic or preventive objectives.
    Vergara CM; Wang F
    Conn Med; 2003 Apr; 67(4):195-203. PubMed ID: 12760079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A primer on the design, conduct, and interpretation of clinical trials.
    Appel LJ
    Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2006 Nov; 1(6):1360-7. PubMed ID: 17699370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Study design: statistical and methodologic considerations.
    Rubenfeld GD
    Respir Care; 1995 Sep; 40(9):980-6. PubMed ID: 10152244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ACCE, pharmacogenomics, and stopping clinical trials: time to extend the CONSORT statement?
    Ozdemir V; Joly Y; Knoppers BM
    Am J Bioeth; 2011 Mar; 11(3):11-3. PubMed ID: 21400375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Don't throw out the observation studies with the bath-water. Assess their quality instead].
    Rosén M; Axelsson S; Lindblom J
    Lakartidningen; 2008 Nov 5-11; 105(45):3191-4. PubMed ID: 19062610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does study design explain the relationship between conflict of interest and positive outcome in clinical trials in psychiatry?
    Wu Y; Deboeck P; Joseph M; Hwang C; Perlis CS; Perlis RH
    J Clin Psychopharmacol; 2009 Dec; 29(6):609-11. PubMed ID: 19910733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Meta-analyses in psychopharmacotherapy: garbage in--garbage out?].
    Weinmann S
    Psychiatr Prax; 2009 Sep; 36(6):255-7. PubMed ID: 19707997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Meta-analyses to reveal insufficient mega-trials].
    Graudal NA; Galløe AM
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1998 Jun; 160(24):3574. PubMed ID: 9641048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Short on evidence. Evidence-based medicine in the witness box.
    Blair L
    Can Fam Physician; 1997 Mar; 43():427-9. PubMed ID: 9116512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the validity of clinical trials.
    Akobeng AK
    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2008 Sep; 47(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 18728521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Five easy pieces on evidence-based medicine (4).
    Kalso E; Edwards J; McQuay HJ; Moore RA
    Eur J Pain; 2002; 6(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 11888232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.