BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

486 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16472379)

  • 1. Comparison of the effectiveness of three manual physical therapy techniques in a subgroup of patients with low back pain who satisfy a clinical prediction rule: study protocol of a randomized clinical trial [NCT00257998].
    Cleland JA; Fritz JM; Childs JD; Kulig K
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2006 Feb; 7():11. PubMed ID: 16472379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the effectiveness of three manual physical therapy techniques in a subgroup of patients with low back pain who satisfy a clinical prediction rule: a randomized clinical trial.
    Cleland JA; Fritz JM; Kulig K; Davenport TE; Eberhart S; Magel J; Childs JD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(25):2720-9. PubMed ID: 19940729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of a lumbar spine manipulation technique by physical therapists in patients who satisfy a clinical prediction rule: a case series.
    Cleland JA; Fritz JM; Whitman JM; Childs JD; Palmer JA
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2006 Apr; 36(4):209-14. PubMed ID: 16676870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A clinical prediction rule to identify patients with low back pain who are likely to experience short-term success following lumbar stabilization exercises: a randomized controlled validation study.
    Rabin A; Shashua A; Pizem K; Dickstein R; Dar G
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2014 Jan; 44(1):6-B13. PubMed ID: 24261926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Derivation and validation phase for the development of clinical prediction rules for rehabilitation in chronic nonspecific low back pain patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Denteneer L; Stassijns G; De Hertogh W; Truijen S; Jansen N; Van Daele U
    Trials; 2015 Jan; 16():4. PubMed ID: 25558975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A clinical prediction rule to identify patients with low back pain most likely to benefit from spinal manipulation: a validation study.
    Childs JD; Fritz JM; Flynn TW; Irrgang JJ; Johnson KK; Majkowski GR; Delitto A
    Ann Intern Med; 2004 Dec; 141(12):920-8. PubMed ID: 15611489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lumbar Thrust Manipulation and Exercise for the Treatment of Mechanical Low Back Pain in Adolescents: A Case Series.
    Walston Z; Yake D
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2016 May; 46(5):391-8. PubMed ID: 27049600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Examination of a clinical prediction rule to identify patients with neck pain likely to benefit from thoracic spine thrust manipulation and a general cervical range of motion exercise: multi-center randomized clinical trial.
    Cleland JA; Mintken PE; Carpenter K; Fritz JM; Glynn P; Whitman J; Childs JD
    Phys Ther; 2010 Sep; 90(9):1239-50. PubMed ID: 20634268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. COMParative Early Treatment Effectiveness between physical therapy and usual care for low back pain (COMPETE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Rhon D; Fritz J
    Trials; 2015 Sep; 16():423. PubMed ID: 26399603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomized control trial to determine the effectiveness and physiological effects of spinal manipulation and spinal mobilization compared to each other and a sham condition in patients with chronic low back pain: Study protocol for The RELIEF Study.
    Clark BC; Russ DW; Nakazawa M; France CR; Walkowski S; Law TD; Applegate M; Mahato N; Lietkam S; Odenthal J; Corcos D; Hain S; Sindelar B; Ploutz-Snyder RJ; Thomas JS
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2018 Jul; 70():41-52. PubMed ID: 29792940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The immediate and long-term effects of exercise and patient education on physical, functional, and quality-of-life outcome measures after single-level lumbar microdiscectomy: a randomized controlled trial protocol.
    Selkowitz DM; Kulig K; Poppert EM; Flanagan SP; Matthews ND; Beneck GJ; Popovich JM; Lona JR; Yamada KA; Burke WS; Ervin C; Powers CM;
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2006 Aug; 7():70. PubMed ID: 16934143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of short-term response to two spinal manipulation techniques for patients with low back pain in a military beneficiary population.
    Sutlive TG; Mabry LM; Easterling EJ; Durbin JD; Hanson SL; Wainner RS; Childs JD
    Mil Med; 2009 Jul; 174(7):750-6. PubMed ID: 19685848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Thoracic spine thrust manipulation versus cervical spine thrust manipulation in patients with acute neck pain: a randomized clinical trial.
    Puentedura EJ; Landers MR; Cleland JA; Mintken PE; Huijbregts P; Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2011 Apr; 41(4):208-20. PubMed ID: 21335931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of spinal manipulation methods and usual medical care for acute and subacute low back pain: a randomized clinical trial.
    Schneider M; Haas M; Glick R; Stevans J; Landsittel D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Feb; 40(4):209-17. PubMed ID: 25423308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Short-term effects of thrust versus nonthrust mobilization/manipulation directed at the thoracic spine in patients with neck pain: a randomized clinical trial.
    Cleland JA; Glynn P; Whitman JM; Eberhart SL; MacDonald C; Childs JD
    Phys Ther; 2007 Apr; 87(4):431-40. PubMed ID: 17341509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does maintained spinal manipulation therapy for chronic nonspecific low back pain result in better long-term outcome?
    Senna MK; Machaly SA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Aug; 36(18):1427-37. PubMed ID: 21245790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of Chuna manual therapy versus conventional usual care for nonacute low back pain: study protocol for a pilot multicenter, pragmatic randomized controlled trial (pCRN study).
    Shin BC; Kim MR; Cho JH; Jung JY; Kim KW; Lee JH; Nam K; Lee MH; Hwang EH; Heo KH; Kim N; Ha IH
    Trials; 2017 Jan; 18(1):26. PubMed ID: 28095892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. No Differences in Outcomes in People with Low Back Pain Who Met the Clinical Prediction Rule for Lumbar Spine Manipulation When a Pragmatic Non-thrust Manipulation Was Used as the Comparator.
    Learman K; Showalter C; O'Halloran B; Donaldson M; Cook C
    Physiother Can; 2014; 66(4):359-66. PubMed ID: 25922557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Immediate improvements in side-to-side weight bearing and iliac crest symmetry after manipulation in patients with low back pain.
    Childs JD; Piva SR; Erhard RE
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2004 Jun; 27(5):306-13. PubMed ID: 15195038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of Spinal Manipulative and Mobilization Therapies in Young Adults With Mild to Moderate Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Thomas JS; Clark BC; Russ DW; France CR; Ploutz-Snyder R; Corcos DM;
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Aug; 3(8):e2012589. PubMed ID: 32756930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.