BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16474914)

  • 1. Likelihood ratio tests in behavioral genetics: problems and solutions.
    Dominicus A; Skrondal A; Gjessing HK; Pedersen NL; Palmgren J
    Behav Genet; 2006 Mar; 36(2):331-40. PubMed ID: 16474914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cholesky problems.
    Carey G
    Behav Genet; 2005 Sep; 35(5):653-65. PubMed ID: 16184491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of statistical selection strategies for univariate and bivariate log-linear models.
    Moses T; Holland PW
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):557-74. PubMed ID: 20030964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of branch length variation on the selection of models of molecular evolution.
    Posada D
    J Mol Evol; 2001 May; 52(5):434-44. PubMed ID: 11443347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Likelihood ratio testing of variance components in the linear mixed-effects model using restricted maximum likelihood.
    Morrell CH
    Biometrics; 1998 Dec; 54(4):1560-8. PubMed ID: 9883552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of analysis of variance and maximum likelihood based path analysis of twin data: partitioning genetic and environmental sources of covariance.
    Christian JC; Norton JA; Sorbel J; Williams CJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 7713398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The intraclass covariance matrix.
    Carey G
    Behav Genet; 2005 Sep; 35(5):667-70. PubMed ID: 16184492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does choice in model selection affect maximum likelihood analysis?
    Ripplinger J; Sullivan J
    Syst Biol; 2008 Feb; 57(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 18275003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combining two-point genetic linkage analyses using mapping functions.
    Schaid DJ; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1994; 11(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 8013885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simulated percentage points for the null distribution of the likelihood ratio test for a mixture of two normals.
    Thode HC; Finch SJ; Mendell NR
    Biometrics; 1988 Dec; 44(4):1195-201. PubMed ID: 3233255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Testing association with interactions by partitioning chi-squares.
    Yang Y; He C; Ott J
    Ann Hum Genet; 2009 Jan; 73(1):109-17. PubMed ID: 18798840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Model selection for mixtures of mutagenetic trees.
    Yin J; Beerenwinkel N; Rahnenführer J; Lengauer T
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article17. PubMed ID: 17049028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the likelihood ratio test in structural equation modeling when parameters are subject to boundary constraints.
    Stoel RD; Garre FG; Dolan C; van den Wittenboer G
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Dec; 11(4):439-55. PubMed ID: 17154756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the asymptotic behavior of the estimate of the recombination fraction under the null hypothesis of no linkage when the model is misspecified.
    Williamson JA; Amos CI
    Genet Epidemiol; 1990; 7(5):309-18. PubMed ID: 2253866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genotypic relative risks under ordered restriction.
    Chiano MN; Clayton DG
    Genet Epidemiol; 1998; 15(2):135-46. PubMed ID: 9554552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. MOD-score analysis with simple pedigrees: an overview of likelihood-based linkage methods.
    Strauch K
    Hum Hered; 2007; 64(3):192-202. PubMed ID: 17536213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A note on the asymptotic properties of affected-sib-pair linkage tests.
    Wang K
    Ann Hum Genet; 2004 Jul; 68(Pt 4):367-75. PubMed ID: 15225162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of item response theory models for sparse 2 tables.
    Cai L; Maydeu-Olivares A; Coffman DL; Thissen D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 May; 59(Pt 1):173-94. PubMed ID: 16709285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling schizophrenic behavior using general mixture components.
    Rubin DB; Wu YN
    Biometrics; 1997 Mar; 53(1):243-61. PubMed ID: 9147594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phylogenetic systematics and biogeography of hummingbirds: Bayesian and maximum likelihood analyses of partitioned data and selection of an appropriate partitioning strategy.
    McGuire JA; Witt CC; Altshuler DL; Remsen JV
    Syst Biol; 2007 Oct; 56(5):837-56. PubMed ID: 17934998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.