These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16475376)

  • 1. A prospective clinical study of indirect and direct composite and ceramic inlays: ten-year results.
    Thordrup M; Isidor F; Hörsted-Bindslev P
    Quintessence Int; 2006 Feb; 37(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 16475376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A 5-year clinical study of indirect and direct resin composite and ceramic inlays.
    Thordrup M; Isidor F; Hörsted-Bindslev P
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Mar; 32(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 12066659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A one-year clinical study of indirect and direct composite and ceramic inlays.
    Thordrup M; Isidor F; Hörsted-Bindslev P
    Scand J Dent Res; 1994 Jun; 102(3):186-92. PubMed ID: 8085126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Composite resin fillings and inlays. An 11-year evaluation.
    Pallesen U; Qvist V
    Clin Oral Investig; 2003 Jun; 7(2):71-9. PubMed ID: 12740693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
    Mendonça JS; Neto RG; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Navarro MF; de Carvalho RM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term clinical results of chairside Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays: a case series.
    Otto T; Schneider D
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 18350948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microleakage of direct and indirect inlay/onlay systems.
    Hasanreĭsoğlu U; Sönmez H; Uçtaşli S; Wilson HJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 1996 Jan; 23(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 8850164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computer-aided direct ceramic restorations: a 10-year prospective clinical study of Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays.
    Otto T; De Nisco S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 11951800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface.
    Cekic I; Ergun G; Uctasli S; Lassila LV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Ceramic inlays and onlays].
    van Pelt AW; de Kloet HJ; van der Kuy P
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1996 Nov; 103(11):472-6. PubMed ID: 11921995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of marginal fit and microleakage of ceramic and composite inlays: an in vitro study.
    Thordrup M; Isidor F; Hörsted-Bindslev P
    J Dent; 1994 Jun; 22(3):147-53. PubMed ID: 8027457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical performance and marginal adaptation of class II direct and semidirect composite restorations over 3.5 years in vivo.
    Spreafico RC; Krejci I; Dietschi D
    J Dent; 2005 Jul; 33(6):499-507. PubMed ID: 15935270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. One-year clinical evaluation of composite and ceramic inlays in posterior teeth.
    Scheibenbogen A; Manhart J; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Oct; 80(4):410-6. PubMed ID: 9791786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with onlays of three contemporary tooth-colored resin-bonded restorative materials.
    Brunton PA; Cattell P; Burke FJ; Wilson NH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Aug; 82(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 10424979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: clinical behavior.
    Frankenberger R; Petschelt A; Krämer N
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):459-65. PubMed ID: 11203857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retrospective clinical investigation and survival analysis on ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns: results up to 7 years.
    Felden A; Schmalz G; Federlin M; Hiller KA
    Clin Oral Investig; 1998 Dec; 2(4):161-7. PubMed ID: 10388388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiopacity of direct ceramic inlay restoratives.
    el-Mowafy OM; Brown JW; McComb D
    J Dent; 1991 Dec; 19(6):366-8. PubMed ID: 1813481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical efficacy of composite versus ceramic inlays and onlays: a systematic review.
    Fron Chabouis H; Smail Faugeron V; Attal JP
    Dent Mater; 2013 Dec; 29(12):1209-18. PubMed ID: 24119328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Polymer-infiltrated ceramic CAD/CAM inlays and partial coverage restorations: 3-year results of a prospective clinical study over 5 years.
    Spitznagel FA; Scholz KJ; Strub JR; Vach K; Gierthmuehlen PC
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Jun; 22(5):1973-1983. PubMed ID: 29214376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Wear of CAD/CAM ceramic inlays: restorations, opposing cusps, and luting cements.
    Krejci I; Lutz F; Reimer M
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Mar; 25(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 8008821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.