These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
707 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16475476)
1. Performance evaluation of the latest fully automated hematology analyzers in a large, commercial laboratory setting: a 4-way, side-by-side study. Bourner G; Dhaliwal J; Sumner J Lab Hematol; 2005; 11(4):285-97. PubMed ID: 16475476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of five automated hematology analyzers in a university hospital setting: Abbott Cell-Dyn Sapphire, Beckman Coulter DxH 800, Siemens Advia 2120i, Sysmex XE-5000, and Sysmex XN-2000. Bruegel M; Nagel D; Funk M; Fuhrmann P; Zander J; Teupser D Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 Jun; 53(7):1057-71. PubMed ID: 25720071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison study of the rates of manual peripheral blood smear review from 3 automated hematology analyzers, Unicel DxH 800, ADVIA 2120i, and XE 2100, using international consensus group guidelines. Kim SJ; Kim Y; Shin S; Song J; Choi JR Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2012 Nov; 136(11):1408-13. PubMed ID: 23106587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the Beckman Coulter UniCel DxH 800, Beckman Coulter LH 780, and Abbott Diagnostics Cell-Dyn Sapphire hematology analyzers on adult specimens in a tertiary care hospital. Tan BT; Nava AJ; George TI Am J Clin Pathol; 2011 Jun; 135(6):939-51. PubMed ID: 21571967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Workflow improvement and impact of the new Beckman Coulter LH 1500 high throughput automated hematology workcell. La Porta AD; Bowden AS; Barr S Lab Hematol; 2004; 10(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 15224765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of four hematology analyzers, CELL-DYN Sapphire, ADVIA 120, Coulter LH 750, and Sysmex XE-2100, in terms of clinical usefulness. Kang SH; Kim HK; Ham CK; Lee DS; Cho HI Int J Lab Hematol; 2008 Dec; 30(6):480-6. PubMed ID: 19062362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of automated differential blood cell counts from Abbott Sapphire, Siemens Advia 120, Beckman Coulter DxH 800, and Sysmex XE-2100 in normal and pathologic samples. Meintker L; Ringwald J; Rauh M; Krause SW Am J Clin Pathol; 2013 May; 139(5):641-50. PubMed ID: 23596116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Evaluation of the Abbott Cell-Dyn Sapphire hematology analyzer]. Park Y; Song J; Song S; Song KS; Ahn MS; Yang MS; Kim I; Choi JR Korean J Lab Med; 2007 Jun; 27(3):162-8. PubMed ID: 18094570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance characteristics of the Coulter LH 500 hematology analyzer. Kaplan SS; Johnson K; Wolfe N; Brown W; Keeney M; Gray-Statchuk L; Yee IC Lab Hematol; 2004; 10(2):76-87. PubMed ID: 15224763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the Beckman Coulter AcT 5 diff AL hematology analyzer in a hospital setting. Bhuta UM; Ulstein H Lab Hematol; 2003; 9(3):167-74. PubMed ID: 14521325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance evaluation of new Abbott Alinity hq hematology analyzer. Woo KS; Jeong IH; An GD; Lim HH; Han JY Int J Lab Hematol; 2019 Oct; 41(5):657-663. PubMed ID: 31271528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the automated hematology analyzer Sysmex XT-2000iV ™ compared to the ADVIA ® 2120 for its use in dogs, cats, and horses. Part II: Accuracy of leukocyte differential and reticulocyte count, impact of anticoagulant and sample aging. Bauer N; Nakagawa J; Dunker C; Failing K; Moritz A J Vet Diagn Invest; 2012 Jan; 24(1):74-89. PubMed ID: 22362937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance evaluation of the Abbott CELL-DYN Emerald for use as a bench-top analyzer in a research setting. Khoo TL; Xiros N; Guan F; Orellana D; Holst J; Joshua DE; Rasko JE Int J Lab Hematol; 2013 Aug; 35(4):447-56. PubMed ID: 23279758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of a total hematology analysis system (Sysmex HS-430). Benefits for large laboratories by reducing manual work load and optimizing screening efficacy for pathologic samples. Födinger M; Speiser W; Karabentcheva S; Scherrer R; Veitl M; Schwarzinger I Am J Clin Pathol; 1995 Nov; 104(5):503-9. PubMed ID: 7572809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of hematological values obtained with reference automated hematology analyzers of six manufacturers. Takubo T; Tatsumi N; Satoh N; Matsuno K; Fujimoto K; Soga M; Yamagami Y; Akiba S; Sudoh T; Miyazaki M Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 2002; 33 Suppl 2():62-7. PubMed ID: 12755270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stability of hematological analytes depends on the hematology analyser used: a stability study with Bayer Advia 120, Beckman Coulter LH 750 and Sysmex XE 2100. Imeri F; Herklotz R; Risch L; Arbetsleitner C; Zerlauth M; Risch GM; Huber AR Clin Chim Acta; 2008 Nov; 397(1-2):68-71. PubMed ID: 18706900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the reticulocyte mode of the Abx Pentra 120 Retic, Coulter General-S, Sysmex SE 9500, Abbott CD 4000 and Bayer Advia 120 haematology analysers in a simultaneous evaluation. Van den Bossche J; Devreese K; Malfait R; Van de Vyvere M; De Schouwer P Clin Lab Haematol; 2001 Dec; 23(6):355-60. PubMed ID: 11843881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of four automated hematology analyzers. Koenn ME; Kirby BA; Cook LL; Hare JL; Hall SH; Barry PM; Hissam CL; Wojcicki SB Clin Lab Sci; 2001; 14(4):238-42. PubMed ID: 11760821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance evaluation and result comparison of the automated hematology analyzers Abbott CD 3700, Sysmex XE 2100 and Coulter LH 750 for cell counts in serous fluids. Yang D; Zhou Y; Chen B Clin Chim Acta; 2013 Apr; 419():113-8. PubMed ID: 23415694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]