697 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16475476)
1. Performance evaluation of the latest fully automated hematology analyzers in a large, commercial laboratory setting: a 4-way, side-by-side study.
Bourner G; Dhaliwal J; Sumner J
Lab Hematol; 2005; 11(4):285-97. PubMed ID: 16475476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of five automated hematology analyzers in a university hospital setting: Abbott Cell-Dyn Sapphire, Beckman Coulter DxH 800, Siemens Advia 2120i, Sysmex XE-5000, and Sysmex XN-2000.
Bruegel M; Nagel D; Funk M; Fuhrmann P; Zander J; Teupser D
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 Jun; 53(7):1057-71. PubMed ID: 25720071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison study of the rates of manual peripheral blood smear review from 3 automated hematology analyzers, Unicel DxH 800, ADVIA 2120i, and XE 2100, using international consensus group guidelines.
Kim SJ; Kim Y; Shin S; Song J; Choi JR
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2012 Nov; 136(11):1408-13. PubMed ID: 23106587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the Beckman Coulter UniCel DxH 800, Beckman Coulter LH 780, and Abbott Diagnostics Cell-Dyn Sapphire hematology analyzers on adult specimens in a tertiary care hospital.
Tan BT; Nava AJ; George TI
Am J Clin Pathol; 2011 Jun; 135(6):939-51. PubMed ID: 21571967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Workflow improvement and impact of the new Beckman Coulter LH 1500 high throughput automated hematology workcell.
La Porta AD; Bowden AS; Barr S
Lab Hematol; 2004; 10(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 15224765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of four hematology analyzers, CELL-DYN Sapphire, ADVIA 120, Coulter LH 750, and Sysmex XE-2100, in terms of clinical usefulness.
Kang SH; Kim HK; Ham CK; Lee DS; Cho HI
Int J Lab Hematol; 2008 Dec; 30(6):480-6. PubMed ID: 19062362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of automated differential blood cell counts from Abbott Sapphire, Siemens Advia 120, Beckman Coulter DxH 800, and Sysmex XE-2100 in normal and pathologic samples.
Meintker L; Ringwald J; Rauh M; Krause SW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2013 May; 139(5):641-50. PubMed ID: 23596116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Evaluation of the Abbott Cell-Dyn Sapphire hematology analyzer].
Park Y; Song J; Song S; Song KS; Ahn MS; Yang MS; Kim I; Choi JR
Korean J Lab Med; 2007 Jun; 27(3):162-8. PubMed ID: 18094570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance characteristics of the Coulter LH 500 hematology analyzer.
Kaplan SS; Johnson K; Wolfe N; Brown W; Keeney M; Gray-Statchuk L; Yee IC
Lab Hematol; 2004; 10(2):76-87. PubMed ID: 15224763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the Beckman Coulter AcT 5 diff AL hematology analyzer in a hospital setting.
Bhuta UM; Ulstein H
Lab Hematol; 2003; 9(3):167-74. PubMed ID: 14521325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance evaluation of new Abbott Alinity hq hematology analyzer.
Woo KS; Jeong IH; An GD; Lim HH; Han JY
Int J Lab Hematol; 2019 Oct; 41(5):657-663. PubMed ID: 31271528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the automated hematology analyzer Sysmex XT-2000iV ™ compared to the ADVIA ® 2120 for its use in dogs, cats, and horses. Part II: Accuracy of leukocyte differential and reticulocyte count, impact of anticoagulant and sample aging.
Bauer N; Nakagawa J; Dunker C; Failing K; Moritz A
J Vet Diagn Invest; 2012 Jan; 24(1):74-89. PubMed ID: 22362937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance evaluation of the Abbott CELL-DYN Emerald for use as a bench-top analyzer in a research setting.
Khoo TL; Xiros N; Guan F; Orellana D; Holst J; Joshua DE; Rasko JE
Int J Lab Hematol; 2013 Aug; 35(4):447-56. PubMed ID: 23279758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the Sysmex Xe-2100 hematology analyzer in hospital use.
Nakul-Aquaronne D; Sudaka-Sammarcelli I; Ferrero-Vacher C; Starck B; Bayle J
J Clin Lab Anal; 2003; 17(4):113-23. PubMed ID: 12784259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of a total hematology analysis system (Sysmex HS-430). Benefits for large laboratories by reducing manual work load and optimizing screening efficacy for pathologic samples.
Födinger M; Speiser W; Karabentcheva S; Scherrer R; Veitl M; Schwarzinger I
Am J Clin Pathol; 1995 Nov; 104(5):503-9. PubMed ID: 7572809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of hematological values obtained with reference automated hematology analyzers of six manufacturers.
Takubo T; Tatsumi N; Satoh N; Matsuno K; Fujimoto K; Soga M; Yamagami Y; Akiba S; Sudoh T; Miyazaki M
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 2002; 33 Suppl 2():62-7. PubMed ID: 12755270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stability of hematological analytes depends on the hematology analyser used: a stability study with Bayer Advia 120, Beckman Coulter LH 750 and Sysmex XE 2100.
Imeri F; Herklotz R; Risch L; Arbetsleitner C; Zerlauth M; Risch GM; Huber AR
Clin Chim Acta; 2008 Nov; 397(1-2):68-71. PubMed ID: 18706900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the reticulocyte mode of the Abx Pentra 120 Retic, Coulter General-S, Sysmex SE 9500, Abbott CD 4000 and Bayer Advia 120 haematology analysers in a simultaneous evaluation.
Van den Bossche J; Devreese K; Malfait R; Van de Vyvere M; De Schouwer P
Clin Lab Haematol; 2001 Dec; 23(6):355-60. PubMed ID: 11843881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of four automated hematology analyzers.
Koenn ME; Kirby BA; Cook LL; Hare JL; Hall SH; Barry PM; Hissam CL; Wojcicki SB
Clin Lab Sci; 2001; 14(4):238-42. PubMed ID: 11760821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance evaluation and result comparison of the automated hematology analyzers Abbott CD 3700, Sysmex XE 2100 and Coulter LH 750 for cell counts in serous fluids.
Yang D; Zhou Y; Chen B
Clin Chim Acta; 2013 Apr; 419():113-8. PubMed ID: 23415694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
