85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16475547)
1. [Seasonal influence on the microbiological colonization on surfaces of milk liners and flushing adapters in a newly installed milking parlor].
Falkenberg U; Reinhold P; Hildebrandt G; Heuwieser W
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2006 Jan; 113(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 16475547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Influence of milking technique, milking hygiene and environmental hygiene parameters on the microbial contamination of milking machines].
Feldmann M; Zimmermann A; Hoedemaker M
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2006 Jul; 113(7):274-81. PubMed ID: 16892707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of ATP bioluminescence for evaluation of surface cleanliness of milking equipment.
Vilar MJ; Rodríguez-Otero JL; Diéguez FJ; Sanjuán ML; Yus E
Int J Food Microbiol; 2008 Jul; 125(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 18547666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence for hygiene testing of rubber liners and tubes on dairy farms.
Lindell IC; Lundh Å; Sjaunja KS; Cederholm M
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Mar; 101(3):2438-2447. PubMed ID: 29290436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of automatic cluster flushing on the concentration of Staphylococcus aureus in teat cup liners.
Skarbye AP; Thomsen PT; Krogh MA; Svennesen L; Østergaard S
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jun; 103(6):5431-5439. PubMed ID: 32229116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stochastic models for simulating parallel, rotary, and side-opening milking parlors.
Nitzan R; Bruckental I; Bar Shira Z; Maltz E; Halachmi I
J Dairy Sci; 2006 Nov; 89(11):4462-72. PubMed ID: 17033036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Short communication: Effect of automatic postmilking teat disinfection and cluster flushing on the milking work routine.
Ohnstad I; Olde Riekerink RG; Hogewerf P; de Koning CA; Barkema HW
J Dairy Sci; 2012 May; 95(5):2567-70. PubMed ID: 22541484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of udder preparation before milking and contamination from the milking plant on bacterial numbers in bulk milk of eight dairy herds.
McKinnon CH; Rowlands GJ; Bramley AJ
J Dairy Res; 1990 Aug; 57(3):307-18. PubMed ID: 2401758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Bacteriological diagnosis with Petrifilm of mastitis pathogens in milk samples from each quarter and bulk milk samples].
Krömker V; Hauptmann T; Bormann A
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2007 Oct; 114(10):378-80, 382-3. PubMed ID: 17970336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Technical design and assessment of tube equipment using two-phase flow for cleaning and disinfection.
Reinemann DJ
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1996 Dec; 199(2-4):355-65. PubMed ID: 9353551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pros and cons of automatic milking in Europe.
Svennersten-Sjaunja KM; Pettersson G
J Anim Sci; 2008 Mar; 86(13 Suppl):37-46. PubMed ID: 17998423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bacterial transport within and among various teatcup and cluster assemblies during milking.
Magee C; Sagi R; Scott NR; Gates RS
J Dairy Sci; 1984 Sep; 67(9):2034-40. PubMed ID: 6386906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Herd problem: udder health. Retrospective study of farms assessed by the Swiss Bovine Health Service (BHS) from 1999 to 2004].
Kirchhofer M; Tavel Lv; Strabel D; Fournier C; Steiner A; Graber HU; Kaufmann T
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2007 Sep; 114(9):338-44. PubMed ID: 17927074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of cleaning procedure and hygienic condition of milking equipment on bacterial count of bulk tank milk.
Bava L; Zucali M; Sandrucci A; Brasca M; Vanoni L; Zanini L; Tamburini A
J Dairy Res; 2011 May; 78(2):211-9. PubMed ID: 21371358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of machine-milking on the bacterial flora of teat duct and mammary gland of ewes.
Skoufos I; Voidarou Ch; Bezirtzoglou E; Tzora A
J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health; 2006 Dec; 53(10):499-501. PubMed ID: 17123430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Machine milking: experimental observations on the life of teat-cup liners.
Ruffo G; Sangiorgi F
Folia Vet Lat; 1976; 6(4):377-84. PubMed ID: 798719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Induction of milk ejection and milk removal in different production systems.
Bruckmaier RM; Wellnitz O
J Anim Sci; 2008 Mar; 86(13 Suppl):15-20. PubMed ID: 17709779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Algorithms for dairy barn design: maternity and milking areas.
Fernández ME; Mariño RA; Carreira XC
J Dairy Sci; 2009 May; 92(5):2276-96. PubMed ID: 19389987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monitoring major mastitis pathogens at the population level based on examination of bulk tank milk samples.
Rysanek D; Zouharova M; Babak V
J Dairy Res; 2009 Feb; 76(1):117-23. PubMed ID: 19121238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A study of bovine mastitis, milking procedures and management practices on 25 Estonian dairy herds.
Haltia L; Honkanen-Buzalski T; Spiridonova I; Olkonen A; Myllys V
Acta Vet Scand; 2006 Nov; 48(1):22. PubMed ID: 17118211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
