BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

436 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16475671)

  • 1. Is induction produced by upcoming food-pellet reinforcement the outcome of an increase in overall activity or in operant responding?
    Weatherly JN; Arthur EI; Nurnberger JT
    J Gen Psychol; 2006 Jan; 133(1):97-111. PubMed ID: 16475671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigating retrospective influences on induction in rats' responding for 1% sucrose when food-pellet reinforcement is upcoming.
    Weatherly JN; Arthur EI
    J Gen Psychol; 2006 Jan; 133(1):81-95. PubMed ID: 16475670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of upcoming food-pellet delivery on subjects' responding for 1% sucrose reinforcement delivered by concurrent random-interval schedules.
    Weatherly JN; Grove C; Beste R
    J Gen Psychol; 2007 Apr; 134(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 17503690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Induction when rats lick for 1% liquid-sucrose reinforcement.
    Weatherly JN; Lang KK; King BM; Beste R; Grove C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Apr; 59(4):654-66. PubMed ID: 16707355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Altering "motivational" variables alters induction produced by upcoming food-pellet reinforcement.
    Weatherly JN; Arthur EI; Tischart LM
    Anim Cogn; 2003 Mar; 6(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 12658532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Duration, response, and location: the influence of upcoming 32% sucrose on rats' licking or lever pressing for 1% liquid sucrose.
    Weatherly JN; Nurnberger JT; Arthur EI; King BM
    Behav Processes; 2005 Aug; 70(1):80-90. PubMed ID: 15939550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of place of reinforcer delivery in the appearance of positive induction when rats respond for 1% sucrose.
    Weatherly JN; Nurnberger JT; Kristiansen-Moen LA
    Behav Processes; 2006 Sep; 73(2):156-63. PubMed ID: 16782285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Responding for sucrose and wheel-running reinforcement: effect of body weight manipulation.
    Belke TW
    Behav Processes; 2004 Feb; 65(2):189-99. PubMed ID: 15222966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Within-session rates of responding when reinforcer magnitude is changed within the session.
    Weatherly JN; McSweeney FK; Swindell S
    J Gen Psychol; 2004 Jan; 131(1):5-16. PubMed ID: 14977028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Up or down: the influence of upcoming reinforcement on consummatory and operant behavior.
    King BM; Brandt AE; Weatherly JN
    J Gen Psychol; 2002 Oct; 129(4):443-61. PubMed ID: 12494994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Response acquisition with signaled delayed reinforcement in a rodent model of ADHD.
    Hand DJ; Fox AT; Reilly MP
    Behav Brain Res; 2010 Dec; 213(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 20438767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lever pressing responses under a fixed-ratio schedule of mice with 6-hydroxydopamine-induced dopamine depletion in the nucleus accumbens.
    Tsutsui Y; Nishizawa K; Kai N; Kobayashi K
    Behav Brain Res; 2011 Feb; 217(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 20943202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of response-contingent incentives in lithium chloride-mediated suppression of an operant response.
    Meachum CL
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1990 May; 42(2):175-95. PubMed ID: 2164238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of sucrose availability and pre-running on the intrinsic value of wheel running as an operant and a reinforcing consequence.
    Belke TW; Pierce WD
    Behav Processes; 2014 Mar; 103():35-42. PubMed ID: 24295809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variable-interval reinforcement schedule value influences responding following REM sleep deprivation.
    Kirby M; Kennedy CH
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Sep; 80(2):253-60. PubMed ID: 14674732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The neurotensin receptor agonist NT69L suppresses sucrose-reinforced operant behavior in the rat.
    Boules M; Iversen I; Oliveros A; Shaw A; Williams K; Robinson J; Fredrickson P; Richelson E
    Brain Res; 2007 Jan; 1127(1):90-8. PubMed ID: 17113052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of sucrose availability on wheel-running as an operant and as a reinforcing consequence on a multiple schedule: Additive effects of extrinsic and automatic reinforcement.
    Belke TW; Pierce WD
    Behav Processes; 2015 Jul; 116():1-7. PubMed ID: 25921837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of reinforcement magnitude and ratio values on behaviour maintained by a cyclic ratio schedule of reinforcement.
    Leslie JC; Boyle C; Shaw D
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2000 Nov; 53(4):289-308. PubMed ID: 11131787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Schedule-controlled operant behavior of rats following oral administration of perchloroethylene: time course and relationship to blood and brain solvent levels.
    Warren DA; Reigle TG; Muralidhara S; Dallas CE
    J Toxicol Environ Health; 1996 Mar; 47(4):345-62. PubMed ID: 8600288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the determinants of induction in responding for sucrose when food pellet reinforcement is upcoming.
    Weatherly JN; Plumm KM; Smith JR; Roberts WA
    Anim Learn Behav; 2002 Nov; 30(4):315-29. PubMed ID: 12593324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.