BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16475757)

  • 1. The physics of computed radiography: measurements of pulse height spectra of photostimulable phosphor screens using prompt luminescence.
    Watt KN; Yan K; DeCrescenzo G; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 2005 Dec; 32(12):3589-98. PubMed ID: 16475757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relative speeds of Kodak computed radiography phosphors and screen-film systems.
    Huda W; Rill LN; Bruner AP
    Med Phys; 1997 Oct; 24(10):1621-8. PubMed ID: 9350716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computed radiography: photostimulable phosphor image plate technology.
    Long BW
    Radiol Technol; 1989; 61(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 2587727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of signal propagation in optically coupled detectors for digital mammography: I. Phosphor screens.
    Maidment AD; Yaffe MJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1995 May; 40(5):877-89. PubMed ID: 7652013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of a photostimulable phosphor system with film for dental radiology.
    Huda W; Rill LN; Benn DK; Pettigrew JC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Jun; 83(6):725-31. PubMed ID: 9195631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Image information transfer properties of x-ray intensifying screens in the energy range from 17 to 320 keV.
    Ginzburg A; Dick CE
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(4):1013-21. PubMed ID: 8413008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An evaluation of the Y2O3:Eu3+ scintillator for application in medical x-ray detectors and image receptors.
    Cavouras D; Kandarakis I; Panayiotakis GS; Evangelou EK; Nomicos CD
    Med Phys; 1996 Dec; 23(12):1965-75. PubMed ID: 8994161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of phosphor persistence on image quality in digital x-ray scanning systems.
    Mainprize JG; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 1998 Dec; 25(12):2440-54. PubMed ID: 9874838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relationship between pixel value and beam quality in photostimulable phosphor imaging.
    Tucker DM; Rezentes PS
    Med Phys; 1997 Jun; 24(6):887-93. PubMed ID: 9198024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monte Carlo study on the imaging performance of powder Lu2SiO5:Ce phosphor screens under x-ray excitation: comparison with Gd2O2S:Tb screens.
    Liaparinos PF; Kandarakis IS; Cavouras DA; Delis HB; Panayiotakis GS
    Med Phys; 2007 May; 34(5):1724-33. PubMed ID: 17555254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating phosphors for use in X-ray image detectors by the effective performance index (EPI) method: application to Eu3+ activated yttrium based materials.
    Cavouras D; Kandarakis I; Prassopoulos P; Kanellopoulos E; Nomicos CD; Panayiotakis GS
    Technol Health Care; 1999; 7(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 10218600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improved computed radiography image quality from a BaFl:Eu photostimulable phosphor plate.
    Nakano Y; Gido T; Honda S; Maezawa A; Wakamatsu H; Yanagita T
    Med Phys; 2002 Apr; 29(4):592-7. PubMed ID: 11991131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Digital luminescence radiography. Part 1: Basic principle, technical execution and clinical use].
    Döhring W; Urbach D
    Fortschr Med; 1991 Oct; 109(30):610-5. PubMed ID: 1761263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Digital radiography using light-emitting detectors. Operative principles and characteristics of images].
    Salvini E
    Radiol Med; 1988 Dec; 76(6):545-51. PubMed ID: 3212237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Physical evaluation of a needle photostimulable phosphor based CR mammography system.
    Marshall NW; Lemmens K; Bosmans H
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):811-24. PubMed ID: 22320791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography.
    Borg E
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Digital luminescence and conventional radiography in laryngeal and pharyngeal diagnosis].
    Malms J; Bier H
    Radiologe; 1991 Aug; 31(8):388-93. PubMed ID: 1947054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [An economic comparison between digital luminescence radiography and conventional film processing in intensive care medicine].
    Peters PE; Dykstra DE; Wiesmann W; Schlüchtermann J; Adam D
    Radiologe; 1992 Nov; 32(11):536-40. PubMed ID: 1461981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of the threshold detail detectability of a screen-film combination and computed radiology under conditions relevant to high-kVp chest radiography.
    Launders JH; Cowen AR
    Phys Med Biol; 1995 Aug; 40(8):1393-8. PubMed ID: 7480121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simultaneous multilayer arthrotomography of the temporomandibular joint using photostimulable phosphor computed radiography.
    Honda E; Ohbayashi N; Sasaki T; Kino K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Sep; 26(5):304-11. PubMed ID: 9482004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.