These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16475757)

  • 41. Anisotropic imaging performance in indirect x-ray imaging detectors.
    Badano A; Kyprianou IS; Sempau J
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2698-713. PubMed ID: 16967568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
    MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
    Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Temperature dependence of x-ray induced luminescence from medical x-ray screens.
    Shearer DR; Rowe LE
    Med Phys; 1987; 14(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 3587138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Y2O2S:Eu phosphor screens evaluation.
    Giakoumakis GE; Nomicos CD; Skountzos P; Koutroubas S; Zisos A; Yiakoumakis EN; Katsarioti MC; Kaliakatsos JA; Rovithi M; Panayiotakis GS
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 8455516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Advances in computed radiography systems and their physical imaging characteristics.
    Cowen AR; Davies AG; Kengyelics SM
    Clin Radiol; 2007 Dec; 62(12):1132-41. PubMed ID: 17981160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Monte Carlo optimization of metal/phosphor screens at megavoltage energies.
    Radcliffe T; Barnea G; Wowk B; Rajapakshe R; Shalev S
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(4):1161-9. PubMed ID: 8413026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Initial experience with digital luminescence radiography in the radiological diagnosis of the visceral cranium].
    Wahlmann UW; Ruppenthal T; Doll G
    Dtsch Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1992; 80(4):209-12. PubMed ID: 1450301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Imaging performance of a digital storage phosphor system.
    Hillen W; Schiebel U; Zaengel T
    Med Phys; 1987; 14(5):744-51. PubMed ID: 3683303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose.
    Rill LN; Brateman L; Arreola M
    Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2727-35. PubMed ID: 14596311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [The visibility of a central venous catheter using digital luminescence radiography in intensive care radiology].
    Galanski M; Prokop M; Thorns E; Oestmann JW; Reichelt S; Haubitz B; Milbradt H; Gräser A; Verner L; Schaefer C
    Rofo; 1992 Jan; 156(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 1733477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Performance characteristics of a Kodak computed radiography system.
    Bradford CD; Peppler WW; Dobbins JT
    Med Phys; 1999 Jan; 26(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 9949395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. AEC set-up optimisation with computed radiography imaging.
    Mazzocchi S; Belli G; Busoni S; Gori C; Menchi I; Salucci P; Taddeucci A; Zatelli G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):169-73. PubMed ID: 16461503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [The new possibilities of digital luminescence radiography (DLR) and digital imaging data processing for the making of field verification images].
    Zimmermann JS; Blume J; Wendhausen H; Hebbinghaus D; Kovács G; Eilf K; Schultze J; Kimmig BN
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1995 Jun; 171(6):332-9. PubMed ID: 7597619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Evaluation of the edge enhancement effect of phase contrast imaging using newly-developed photostimulable phosphor plate].
    Matsuo S; Morishita J; Katafuchi T; Fujita H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2012; 68(5):563-72. PubMed ID: 22687901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Light production from intensifying screens (theoretical and experimental aspects)].
    Giacomich R; Tomasini F; Bacarini L; Di Lelio A
    Radiol Med; 1982; 68(7-8):571-80. PubMed ID: 7134508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The imaging performance of compact Lu2O3:Eu powdered phosphor screens: Monte Carlo simulation for applications in mammography.
    Liaparinos PF; Kandarakis IS
    Med Phys; 2009 Jun; 36(6):1985-97. PubMed ID: 19610287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparison of imaging properties of a computed radiography system and screen-film systems.
    Sanada S; Doi K; Xu XW; Yin FF; Giger ML; MacMahon H
    Med Phys; 1991; 18(3):414-20. PubMed ID: 1870484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparison of technique errors of intraoral radiographs taken on film v photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates.
    Zhang W; Huynh CP; Abramovitch K; Leon IL; Arvizu L
    Tex Dent J; 2012 Jun; 129(6):589-96. PubMed ID: 22866414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Status and prospects of digital detector technology for CR and DR.
    Neitzel U
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):32-8. PubMed ID: 15933078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Recent developments in x-ray luminescent imaging systems].
    Gurvic AM; Wolf M; Starick D
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1990; 31(4):401-8. PubMed ID: 2236548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.