These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16475775)

  • 1. Contrast cancellation technique applied to digital x-ray imaging using silicon strip detectors.
    Avila C; Lopez J; Sanabria JC; Baldazzi G; Bollini D; Gombia M; Cabal AE; Ceballos C; Diaz Garcia A; Gambaccini M; Taibi A; Sarnelli A; Tuffanelli A; Giubellino P; Marzari-Chiesa A; Prino F; Tomassi E; Grybos P; Idzik M; Swientek K; Wiacek P; Montaño LM; Ramello L; Sitta M
    Med Phys; 2005 Dec; 32(12):3755-66. PubMed ID: 16475775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monte Carlo simulation for the estimation of the glandular breast dose for a digital breast tomosynthesis system.
    Rodrigues L; Magalhaes LA; Braz D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Dec; 167(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 25480841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computer analysis of mammography phantom images (CAMPI): an application to the measurement of microcalcification image quality of directly acquired digital images.
    Chakraborty DP
    Med Phys; 1997 Aug; 24(8):1269-77. PubMed ID: 9284251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mammographic phantom studies with synchrotron radiation.
    Johnston RE; Washburn D; Pisano E; Burns C; Thomlinson WC; Chapman LD; Arfelli F; Gmur NF; Zhong Z; Sayers D
    Radiology; 1996 Sep; 200(3):659-63. PubMed ID: 8756911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Monte Carlo study of x-ray fluorescence in x-ray detectors.
    Boone JM; Seibert JA; Sabol JM; Tecotzky M
    Med Phys; 1999 Jun; 26(6):905-16. PubMed ID: 10436891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Direct digital magnification mammography with a large-surface detector made of amorphous silicon].
    Hermann KP; Hundertmark C; Funke M; von Brenndorff A; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 1999 May; 170(5):503-6. PubMed ID: 10370416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A scatter correction method for dual-energy digital mammography: Monte Carlo simulation.
    Ai K; Gao Y; Yu G
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2014; 22(5):653-71. PubMed ID: 25265925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital mammography image simulation using Monte Carlo.
    Peplow DE; Verghese K
    Med Phys; 2000 Mar; 27(3):568-79. PubMed ID: 10757608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: Glandular dose estimation using a Monte Carlo code and voxel phantom.
    Tzamicha E; Yakoumakis E; Tsalafoutas IA; Dimitriadis A; Georgiou E; Tsapaki V; Chalazonitis A
    Phys Med; 2015 Nov; 31(7):785-91. PubMed ID: 25900891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monte Carlo simulation of a miniature, radiosurgery x-ray tube using the ITS 3.0 coupled electron-photon transport code.
    Yanch JC; Harte KJ
    Med Phys; 1996 Sep; 23(9):1551-8. PubMed ID: 8892253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monte Carlo simulation of primary electron production inside an a-selenium detector for x-ray mammography: physics.
    Sakellaris T; Spyrou G; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(16):3717-38. PubMed ID: 16077223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of x-ray energy dispersion in digital subtraction imaging at the iodine K-edge--a Monte Carlo study.
    Prino F; Ceballos C; Cabal A; Sarnelli A; Gambaccini M; Ramello L
    Med Phys; 2008 Jan; 35(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 18293556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Method for measuring the focal spot size of an x-ray tube using a coded aperture mask and a digital detector.
    Russo P; Mettivier G
    Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):2099-115. PubMed ID: 21626943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Design and evaluation of an external filter technique for exposure equalization in mammography.
    Keshavmurthy SP; Goodsitt MM; Chan HP; Helvie MA; Christodoulou E
    Med Phys; 1999 Aug; 26(8):1655-69. PubMed ID: 10501065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: patient radiation dose estimation using a Monte Carlo code.
    Yakoumakis E; Tzamicha E; Dimitriadis A; Georgiou E; Tsapaki V; Chalazonitis A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):369-72. PubMed ID: 25836682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms.
    Kuzmiak CM; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Zeng D; Burns CB; Roberto C; Pavic D; Lee Y; Seo BK; Koomen M; Washburn D
    Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3144-50. PubMed ID: 16279068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Compact x-ray sources for mammographic applications: Monte Carlo simulations of image quality.
    Oliva P; Golosio B; Stumbo S; Bravin A; Tomassini P
    Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):5149-61. PubMed ID: 19994525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast imaging using an amorphous silicon-based full-field digital mammographic system: stability of a clinical prototype.
    Vedantham S; Karellas A; Suryanarayanan S; D'Orsi CJ; Hendrick RE
    J Digit Imaging; 2000 Nov; 13(4):191-9. PubMed ID: 11110258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Scatter correction in digital mammography based on image deconvolution.
    Ducote JL; Molloi S
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Mar; 55(5):1295-309. PubMed ID: 20134081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Monte Carlo generated mammograms: development and validation.
    Spyrou G; Tzanakos G; Bakas A; Panayiotakis G
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Nov; 43(11):3341-57. PubMed ID: 9832020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.