These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16475775)

  • 21. Full modelling of the MOSAIC animal PET system based on the GATE Monte Carlo simulation code.
    Merheb C; Petegnief Y; Talbot JN
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(3):563-76. PubMed ID: 17228105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Signal-to-noise ratio evaluation in dual-energy radiography with synchrotron radiation.
    Fabbri S; Taibi A; Longo R; Marziani M; Olivo A; Pani S; Tuffanelli A; Gambaccini M
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Nov; 47(22):4093-105. PubMed ID: 12476984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Experimental investigation of the dose and image quality characteristics of a digital mammography imaging system.
    Huda W; Sajewicz AM; Ogden KM; Dance DR
    Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):442-8. PubMed ID: 12674245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Monte Carlo performance on the x-ray converter thickness in digital mammography using software breast models.
    Liaparinos P; Bliznakova K
    Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6638-51. PubMed ID: 23127058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. X-ray spectrum optimization of full-field digital mammography: simulation and phantom study.
    Bernhardt P; Mertelmeier T; Hoheisel M
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4337-49. PubMed ID: 17153413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for C-arm mammography tomosynthesis.
    Rakowski JT; Dennis MJ
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3018-32. PubMed ID: 16964880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Feasibility study for positron emission mammography.
    Thompson CJ; Murthy K; Weinberg IN; Mako F
    Med Phys; 1994 Apr; 21(4):529-38. PubMed ID: 8058019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Monochromatic x-rays in digital mammography.
    Lawaczeck R; Arkadiev V; Diekmann F; Krumrey M
    Invest Radiol; 2005 Jan; 40(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 15597018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Composite x-ray image assembly for large-field digital mammography with one- and two-dimensional positioning of a focal plane array.
    Halama G; McAdoo J; Liu H
    Med Phys; 1998 Feb; 25(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 9507476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An iterative three-dimensional electron density imaging algorithm using uncollimated compton scattered x rays from a polyenergetic primary pencil beam.
    Van Uytven E; Pistorius S; Gordon R
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):256-65. PubMed ID: 17278511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dual-energy digital mammography for calcification imaging: scatter and nonuniformity corrections.
    Kappadath SC; Shaw CC
    Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3395-408. PubMed ID: 16372415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Visibility of simulated microcalcifications--a hardcopy-based comparison of three mammographic systems.
    Lai CJ; Shaw CC; Whitman GJ; Johnston DA; Yang WT; Selinko V; Arribas E; Dogan B; Kappadath SC
    Med Phys; 2005 Jan; 32(1):182-94. PubMed ID: 15719969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. K-edge digital subtraction imaging based on a dichromatic and compact x-ray source.
    Sarnelli A; Taibi A; Tuffanelli A; Baldazzi G; Bollini D; Cabal Rodriguez AE; Gombia M; Prino F; Ramello L; Tomassi E; Gambaccini M
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jul; 49(14):3291-305. PubMed ID: 15357198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Optimal photon energy comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and mammography: a case study.
    Di Maria S; Baptista M; Felix M; Oliveira N; Matela N; Janeiro L; Vaz P; Orvalho L; Silva A
    Phys Med; 2014 Jun; 30(4):482-8. PubMed ID: 24613514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Experimental phantom lesion detectability study using a digital breast tomosynthesis prototype system.
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Wenkel E; Lell M; Böhner C; Bautz WA; Mertelmeier T
    Rofo; 2006 Dec; 178(12):1219-23. PubMed ID: 17136645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cone-beam volume CT breast imaging: feasibility study.
    Chen B; Ning R
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):755-70. PubMed ID: 12033572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A semianalytic model to investigate the potential applications of x-ray scatter imaging.
    Leclair RJ; Johns PC
    Med Phys; 1998 Jun; 25(6):1008-20. PubMed ID: 9650191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Monte Carlo simulation of a mammographic test phantom.
    Hunt RA; Dance DR; Pachoud M; Alm Carlsson G; Sandborg M; Ullman G; Verdun FR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):432-5. PubMed ID: 15933151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mammography of a phantom and breast tissue with synchrotron radiation and a linear-array silicon detector.
    Arfelli F; Bonvicini V; Bravin A; Cantatore G; Castelli E; Dalla Palma L; Di Michiel M; Longo R; Olivo A; Pani S; Pontoni D; Poropat P; Prest M; Rashevsky A; Tromba G; Vacchi A
    Radiology; 1998 Sep; 208(3):709-15. PubMed ID: 9722850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Monte-Carlo simulation of a slot-scanning X-ray imaging system.
    Kulkarni M; Dendere R; Nicolls F; Steiner S; Douglas TS
    Phys Med; 2016 Jan; 32(1):284-9. PubMed ID: 26725256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.