385 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16475776)
1. Technique factors and their relationship to radiation dose in pendant geometry breast CT.
Boone JM; Kwan AL; Seibert JA; Shah N; Lindfors KK; Nelson TR
Med Phys; 2005 Dec; 32(12):3767-76. PubMed ID: 16475776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comprehensive analysis of DgN(CT) coefficients for pendant-geometry cone-beam breast computed tomography.
Boone JM; Shah N; Nelson TR
Med Phys; 2004 Feb; 31(2):226-35. PubMed ID: 15000608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiation doses in volume-of-interest breast computed tomography--A Monte Carlo simulation study.
Lai CJ; Zhong Y; Yi Y; Wang T; Shaw CC
Med Phys; 2015 Jun; 42(6):3063-75. PubMed ID: 26127058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dosimetric characterization of a dedicated breast computed tomography clinical prototype.
Sechopoulos I; Feng SS; D'Orsi CJ
Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4110-20. PubMed ID: 20879571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose and image quality evaluation.
Boone JM; Nelson TR; Lindfors KK; Seibert JA
Radiology; 2001 Dec; 221(3):657-67. PubMed ID: 11719660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characterization of the homogeneous tissue mixture approximation in breast imaging dosimetry.
Sechopoulos I; Bliznakova K; Qin X; Fei B; Feng SS
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5050-9. PubMed ID: 22894430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for arbitrary X-ray spectra in mammography: computer-fit values of Monte Carlo derived data.
Boone JM
Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):869-75. PubMed ID: 12033583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiation dosimetry of a clinical prototype dedicated cone-beam breast CT system with offset detector.
Tseng HW; Karellas A; Vedantham S
Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 48(3):1079-1088. PubMed ID: 33501686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Investigation of the dose distribution for a cone beam CT system dedicated to breast imaging.
Lanconelli N; Mettivier G; Lo Meo S; Russo P
Phys Med; 2013 Jun; 29(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 22763280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast dose in mammography is about 30% lower when realistic heterogeneous glandular distributions are considered.
Hernandez AM; Seibert JA; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6337-48. PubMed ID: 26520725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Updated breast CT dose coefficients (DgN
Hernandez AM; Becker AE; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1455-1466. PubMed ID: 30661250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiation dose affected by mammographic composition and breast size: first application of a radiation dose management system for full-field digital mammography in Korean women.
Baek JE; Kang BJ; Kim SH; Lee HS
World J Surg Oncol; 2017 Feb; 15(1):38. PubMed ID: 28153022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetric characterization and organ dose assessment in digital breast tomosynthesis: Measurements and Monte Carlo simulations using voxel phantoms.
Baptista M; Di Maria S; Barros S; Figueira C; Sarmento M; Orvalho L; Vaz P
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3788-800. PubMed ID: 26133581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monte Carlo simulation for the estimation of the glandular breast dose for a digital breast tomosynthesis system.
Rodrigues L; Magalhaes LA; Braz D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Dec; 167(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 25480841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Investigating energy deposition in glandular tissues for mammography using multiscale Monte Carlo simulations.
Oliver PAK; Thomson RM
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1426-1436. PubMed ID: 30657190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical digital breast tomosynthesis system: dosimetric characterization.
Feng SS; Sechopoulos I
Radiology; 2012 Apr; 263(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 22332070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Monte Carlo model for mean glandular dose evaluation in spot compression mammography.
Sarno A; Dance DR; van Engen RE; Young KC; Russo P; Di Lillo F; Mettivier G; Bliznakova K; Fei B; Sechopoulos I
Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3848-3860. PubMed ID: 28500759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-layer heterogeneous mammographic phantoms for Monte Carlo simulation of normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography.
Chang TY; Lai KJ; Tu CY; Wu J
Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):2234. PubMed ID: 32042071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Glandular dose indices using a glandular dose to air kerma volume histogram in mammography.
Shinohara S; Araki F; Ohno T
Med Phys; 2020 Mar; 47(3):1340-1348. PubMed ID: 31859402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. TLD measurements of in vivo mammographic exposures and the calculated mean glandular dose across the United States.
Gentry JR; DeWerd LA
Med Phys; 1996 Jun; 23(6):899-903. PubMed ID: 8798175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
