These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16477059)

  • 1. Sources of bias in diagnostic accuracy studies and the diagnostic process.
    Furukawa TA; Guyatt GH
    CMAJ; 2006 Feb; 174(4):481-2. PubMed ID: 16477059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. General radiologists' diagnostic accuracy: incomplete presentation of data casts doubt on study's conclusions.
    Zivian MT; Gershater R; Erly WK; Ashdown BC; Lucio RW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Feb; 184(2):697-9. PubMed ID: 15671405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. There is nothing staid about STARD: progress in the reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Johnston KC; Holloway RG
    Neurology; 2006 Sep; 67(5):740-1. PubMed ID: 16966532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multivariable adjustments counteract spectrum and test review bias in accuracy studies.
    Bachmann LM; ter Riet G; Weber WE; Kessels AG
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Apr; 62(4):357-361.e2. PubMed ID: 18620840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Rutjes AW; Reitsma JB; Di Nisio M; Smidt N; van Rijn JC; Bossuyt PM
    CMAJ; 2006 Feb; 174(4):469-76. PubMed ID: 16477057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 5. Diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Manchikanti L; Derby R; Wolfer L; Singh V; Datta S; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(3):517-40. PubMed ID: 19461821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence-based laboratory medicine: addressing bias, generalisability and applicability in studies on diagnostic accuracy. The STARD initiative.
    McQueen M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2003 Jan; 41(1):1. PubMed ID: 12636041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Results of diagnostic accuracy studies are not always validated.
    Van den Bruel A; Aertgeerts B; Buntinx F
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Jun; 59(6):559-66. PubMed ID: 16713517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Better reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy.
    Pai M; Sharma S
    Indian J Med Microbiol; 2005 Oct; 23(4):210-3. PubMed ID: 16327114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Critically appraising studies reporting assessing diagnostic tests.
    O'Connor A; Evans RB
    Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract; 2007 May; 37(3):487-97. PubMed ID: 17466752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Expectations of the bearer of the cost of clinical studies and transformation to care by physicians under contract].
    Perleth M
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2005 Jul; 130 Suppl 2():S72-6. PubMed ID: 15988672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do we need a checklist for reporting the results of diagnostic test evaluations? The STARD proposal.
    Gatsonis C
    Acad Radiol; 2003 Jun; 10(6):599-600. PubMed ID: 12809411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Evaluation of diagnostic methods].
    Doyon F; Hill C
    J Radiol; 2001 Feb; 82(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 11428206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New methods in the assessment of diagnostic procedures.
    Kleijnen J
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2006; 100(7):519-25. PubMed ID: 17137065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. QUADOMICS: an adaptation of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Assessment (QUADAS) for the evaluation of the methodological quality of studies on the diagnostic accuracy of '-omics'-based technologies.
    Lumbreras B; Porta M; Márquez S; Pollán M; Parker LA; Hernández-Aguado I
    Clin Biochem; 2008 Nov; 41(16-17):1316-25. PubMed ID: 18652812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The STARD initiative and the reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy.
    Bruns DE
    Clin Chem; 2003 Jan; 49(1):19-20. PubMed ID: 12507955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sample size for diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Salmi LR; Michel P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Aug; 57(8):869-70; author reply 871-2. PubMed ID: 15485744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of two or more measurement techniques to a standard.
    Proschan MA; Leifer ES
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2006 Oct; 27(5):472-82. PubMed ID: 16750939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement: has it improved?
    Smidt N; Rutjes AW; van der Windt DA; Ostelo RW; Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bouter LM; de Vet HC
    Neurology; 2006 Sep; 67(5):792-7. PubMed ID: 16966539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Roaming through methodology. X. The testing of diagnostic procedures].
    Bossuyt PM; Lijmer JG; Mol BW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Oct; 142(43):2345-7. PubMed ID: 9864513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.