945 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16477275)
1. [Authorship and co-authorship].
Haug C
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Feb; 126(4):429. PubMed ID: 16477275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Investigation of scientific fraud. Statements from the Swedish Research Council not sufficiently normative].
Werkö L
Lakartidningen; 2006 Oct 25-31; 103(43):3288-91. PubMed ID: 17117661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The manuscript review process.
Triadafilopoulos G
Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Dec; 64(6 Suppl):S23-5. PubMed ID: 17113850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Promoting ethical conduct in the publication of research.
Freedman JE
Cardiovasc Ther; 2008; 26(2):89-90. PubMed ID: 18485131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A statement on ethics from the HEART group.
HEART Group
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 May; 71(6):859-61. PubMed ID: 18412086
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Sponsorship, authorship, and accountability.
Davidoff F; DeAngelis CD; Drazen JM; Nicholls MG; Hoey J; Højgaard L; Horton R; Kotzin S; Nylenna M; Overbeke AJ; Sox HC; Van Der Weyden MB; Wilkes MS
N Engl J Med; 2001 Sep; 345(11):825-6; discussion 826-7. PubMed ID: 11556304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Big and small research fraud].
Nylenna M
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Aug; 126(16):2089. PubMed ID: 16932774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A Statement on Ethics From the HEART Group.
HEART Group
Circ Res; 2008 May; 102(9):e104-5. PubMed ID: 18467635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Beautification and fraud.
Nat Cell Biol; 2006 Feb; 8(2):101-2. PubMed ID: 16450003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [When the editor makes an error].
Hem E
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Oct; 128(20):2303. PubMed ID: 19096482
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Retractions' realities.
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6927):1. PubMed ID: 12621394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Scientific authorship. Part 1. A window into scientific fraud?
Claxton LD
Mutat Res; 2005 Jan; 589(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 15652224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. If it's too good to be true, it probably is.
Kennedy MS
Am J Nurs; 2009 Dec; 109(12):7. PubMed ID: 19935148
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Scientific authorship. Part 2. History, recurring issues, practices, and guidelines.
Claxton LD
Mutat Res; 2005 Jan; 589(1):31-45. PubMed ID: 15652225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ghost story: at medical journals, writers paid by industry play big role.
Mathews AW
Wall St J (East Ed); 2005 Dec; ():A1, A8. PubMed ID: 16506304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Copy is fraudulent--but what is the consequence?].
Nielsen OH; Schroeder TV
Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 Nov; 168(45):3891. PubMed ID: 17118247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Upgrading our instructions for authors.
Schriger DL; Wears RL; Cooper RJ; Callaham ML
Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Apr; 41(4):565-7. PubMed ID: 12658258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Dealing with editorial misconduct: what about relationship with reviewers and authors?
Laube RE
BMJ; 2005 Feb; 330(7487):364. PubMed ID: 15705711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Hwang case review committee misses the mark.
Rossner M
J Cell Biol; 2007 Jan; 176(2):131-2. PubMed ID: 17210952
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Journals under pressure: publish, and be damned.
Adam D; Knight J
Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):772-6. PubMed ID: 12397323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
