BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16477520)

  • 1. A further analysis of sexual isolation between sympatric and allopatric populations of Drosophila Pseudoobscura and D. persimilis : rejoinder to Noor and Ortíz-Barrientos.
    Anderson WW; Kim YK
    Behav Genet; 2006 Mar; 36(2):328-30. PubMed ID: 16477520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simulating natural conditions in the laboratory: a re-examination of sexual isolation between sympatric and allopatric populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
    Noor MA; Ortíz-Barrientos D
    Behav Genet; 2006 Mar; 36(2):322-7. PubMed ID: 16502138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sexual isolation between sympatric and allopatric populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
    Anderson WW; Kim YK
    Behav Genet; 2005 May; 35(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 15864445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Postmating-prezygotic isolation is not an important source of selection for reinforcement within and between species in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
    Lorch PD; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):1039-45. PubMed ID: 16136803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A biogeographic genetic approach for testing the role of reinforcement: the case of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
    Kulathinal RJ; Singh RS
    Evolution; 2000 Feb; 54(1):210-7. PubMed ID: 10937197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sexual isolation and mating propensity among allopatric Drosophila mettleri populations.
    Castrezana SJ; Markow TA
    Behav Genet; 2008 Jul; 38(4):437-45. PubMed ID: 18561017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sympatry, allopatry and sexual isolation between Drosophila mojavensis and D. arizonae.
    Massie KR; Markow TA
    Hereditas; 2005 Feb; 142(2005):51-5. PubMed ID: 16970612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sexual conflict does not drive reproductive isolation in experimental populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Bacigalupe LD; Crudgington HS; Hunter F; Moore AJ; Snook RR
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Sep; 20(5):1763-71. PubMed ID: 17714294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The evolution of reproductive character displacement conflicts with how sexual selection operates within a species.
    Higgie M; Blows MW
    Evolution; 2008 May; 62(5):1192-203. PubMed ID: 18298640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of experimental design on Drosophila sexual isolation studies: direct effects and comparison to field hybridization data.
    Coyne JA; Elwyn S; Rolán-Alvarez E
    Evolution; 2005 Dec; 59(12):2588-601. PubMed ID: 16526506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence for a one-allele assortative mating locus.
    Ortíz-Barrientos D; Noor MA
    Science; 2005 Dec; 310(5753):1467. PubMed ID: 16322450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are traits that experience reinforcement also under sexual selection?
    Higgie M; Blows MW
    Am Nat; 2007 Sep; 170(3):409-20. PubMed ID: 17879191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Sexual isolation: determinism and role in speciation].
    Petit C
    Annee Biol; 1967; 6(5):271-85. PubMed ID: 5610381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genetics of incipient speciation in Drosophila mojavensis. I. Male courtship song, mating success, and genotype x environment interactions.
    Etges WJ; de Oliveira CC; Gragg E; Ortíz-Barrientos D; Noor MA; Ritchie MG
    Evolution; 2007 May; 61(5):1106-19. PubMed ID: 17492965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ethological isolation between sympatric and allopatric species of the Obscura group of Drosophila.
    Dobzhansky T; Ehrman L; Kastritsis PA
    Anim Behav; 1968 Feb; 16(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 5639907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Linking behavioral ecology with population genetics: insights from Drosophila nigrospiracula.
    Pfeiler E; Ngo NM; Markow TA
    Hereditas; 2005 Feb; 142(2005):1-6. PubMed ID: 16970604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A test of the chromosomal rearrangement model of speciation in Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Brown KM; Burk LM; Henagan LM; Noor MA
    Evolution; 2004 Aug; 58(8):1856-60. PubMed ID: 15446438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Divergence in the calling songs between sympatric and allopatric populations of the southern wood cricket Gryllus fultoni (Orthoptera: Gryllidae).
    Jang Y; Gerhardt HC
    J Evol Biol; 2006 Mar; 19(2):459-72. PubMed ID: 16599922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Polyandry and paternity skew in natural and experimental populations of Drosophila serrata.
    Frentiu FD; Chenoweth SF
    Mol Ecol; 2008 Mar; 17(6):1589-96. PubMed ID: 18266626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence of reinforcement of premating isolation between two species of the genus Ochthebius (Coleoptera: Hydraenidae).
    Urbanelli S; Porretta D
    Evolution; 2008 Jun; 62(6):1520-7. PubMed ID: 18363862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.