These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16477733)

  • 1. Planned Parenthood of Central New Jersey v. Farmer.
    New Jersey. Supreme Court
    Wests Atl Report; 2000; 762():620-47. PubMed ID: 16477733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. North Florida Women's Health Services v. State.
    Florida. Supreme Court
    Wests South Report; 2003; 866():612-74. PubMed ID: 16479690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Planned Parenthood of Rocky Mountains v. Owens.
    United States. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
    Wests Fed Rep; 2002; 287():910-35. PubMed ID: 16477721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The next abortion decision.
    N Y Times Web; 2005 Nov; ():A34. PubMed ID: 16450474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Planned Parenthood Association of Atlanta Area v. Harris.
    U.S. District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division
    Fed Suppl; 1987 Sep; 670():971-98. PubMed ID: 11648379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts v. Attorney General.
    Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court
    North East Rep Second Ser; 1997 Mar; 677():101-14. PubMed ID: 12041240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Planned Parenthood of Idaho v. Wasden.
    United States. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    Wests Fed Rep; 2004; 376():908-44. PubMed ID: 17225343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Parental notification and a minor's right to an abortion after Hodgson and Akron II.
    Graziano SG
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1991; 17(3):581-97. PubMed ID: 16145809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Indiana Planned Parenthood Affiliates Association v. Pearson.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
    Fed Report; 1983 Aug; 716():1127-44. PubMed ID: 11648507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Case reopens abortion issue for justices.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 2005 Nov; ():A19. PubMed ID: 16450459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Planned Parenthood of Blue Ridge v. Camblos.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1998 Aug; 155():352-92. PubMed ID: 11648641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Parents, judges, and a minor's abortion decisions: third party participation and the evolution of a judicial alternative.
    Green W
    Akron Law Rev; 1983; 17(1):87-110. PubMed ID: 16086471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Legal aspects of abortion practice.
    Goldman EB
    Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Mar; 13(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 3709009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Wicklund v. Lambert.
    U.S. District Court, D. Montana, Butte Division
    Fed Suppl; 1997 Oct; 979():1285-90. PubMed ID: 11648429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions.
    Haas-Wilson D
    J Policy Anal Manage; 1993; 12(3):498-511. PubMed ID: 10127357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. State regulation of abortion upon minors: the Supreme Court permits parental notification statutes.
    Harper LF
    J Med Assoc Ga; 1990 Oct; 79(10):771-4. PubMed ID: 2230616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Zbaraz v. Hartigan.
    U.S. District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D
    Fed Suppl; 1991 Oct; 776():375-86. PubMed ID: 11648407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The worst of both worlds?: parental involvement requirements and the privacy rights of mature minors.
    O'Shaughnessy M
    Ohio State Law J; 1996; 57(5):1731-65. PubMed ID: 16086519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Supreme Court bars mandatory parental role in minors' abortions.
    Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1979 Aug; 8(4):37-9. PubMed ID: 12278191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preserving the right to choose: a minor's right to confidential reproductive health care.
    Bertuglia J
    Womens Rights Law Report; 2001; 23(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 12774775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.