BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16478388)

  • 21. Visual memory for shapes in deaf signers and nonsigners and in hearing signers and nonsigners: atypical lateralization and enhancement.
    Cattani A; Clibbens J; Perfect TJ
    Neuropsychology; 2007 Jan; 21(1):114-21. PubMed ID: 17201534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Response selection in visual search: the influence of response compatibility of nontargets.
    Starreveld PA; Theeuwes J; Mortier K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Feb; 30(1):56-78. PubMed ID: 14769068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the primary motor cortex modulates response interference in a flanker task.
    Soto D; Montoro PR; Humphreys GW
    Neurosci Lett; 2009 Feb; 451(3):261-5. PubMed ID: 19146925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Self-construal priming modulates the scope of visual attention.
    Lin Z; Han S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Apr; 62(4):802-13. PubMed ID: 18720280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. On the relationship between flanker interference and localized attentional interference.
    McCarley JS; Mounts JR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 May; 128(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 18155179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Change blindness in profoundly deaf individuals and cochlear implant recipients.
    Bottari D; Turatto M; Bonfioli F; Abbadessa C; Selmi S; Beltrame MA; Pavani F
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1242():209-18. PubMed ID: 18597741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Differences in arithmetic subtraction of nonsymbolic numerosities by deaf and hearing adults.
    Masataka N
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2006; 11(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 16306180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Inter-individual differences in the polarity of early visual responses and attention effects.
    Proverbio AM; Del Zotto M; Zani A
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 May; 419(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 17490815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Recall in acoustically similar and dissimilar letters by normal and deaf subjects.
    Sípos I; Arochová O
    Act Nerv Super (Praha); 1975 Sep; 17(3):169-75. PubMed ID: 1199683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of acute alcohol intoxication on visuospatial attention.
    do Canto-Pereira LH; de P A David I; Machado-Pinheiro W; Ranvaud RD
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2007 Apr; 26(4):311-9. PubMed ID: 17615112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Response latency measurements to visual cognitive tasks by normal hearing and deaf subjects.
    Chovan JD; Waldron MB; Rose S
    Percept Mot Skills; 1988 Aug; 67(1):179-84. PubMed ID: 3211670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Online response preparation in a rapid serial visual search task.
    Miller J; Schröter H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Dec; 28(6):1364-90. PubMed ID: 12542133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities.
    Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Interactions between attention and perceptual grouping in human visual cortex.
    Khoe W; Freeman E; Woldorff MG; Mangun GR
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):101-11. PubMed ID: 16500628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Lateral masking, levels of processing and stimulus category: a comparative study between normal and dyslexic readers.
    Pernet C; Valdois S; Celsis P; Démonet JF
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(12):2374-85. PubMed ID: 16777147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Spatial coincidence modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect.
    Koppen C; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 May; 417(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 17408855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Mental rotation of mirrored letters: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Núñez-Peña MI; Aznar-Casanova JA
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Feb; 69(1):180-7. PubMed ID: 18713660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effects of visual, auditory, and mixed cues on choice reaction in Parkinson's disease.
    Akamatsu T; Fukuyama H; Kawamata T
    J Neurol Sci; 2008 Jun; 269(1-2):118-25. PubMed ID: 18279895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cognitive interference and aging: insights from a spatial stimulus-response consistency task.
    Juncos-Rabadán O; Pereiro AX; Facal D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):237-46. PubMed ID: 17601480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Age-related differences in cognitive function using a global local hierarchical paradigm.
    Georgiou-Karistianis N; Tang J; Mehmedbegovic F; Farrow M; Bradshaw J; Sheppard D
    Brain Res; 2006 Dec; 1124(1):86-95. PubMed ID: 17069772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.