81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16478660)
21. The effect of resonance tubes on glottal contact quotient with and without task instruction: a comparison of trained and untrained voices.
Gaskill CS; Quinney DM
J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):e79-93. PubMed ID: 21550779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Loading changes in time-based parameters of glottal flow waveforms in different ergonomic conditions.
Vilkman E; Lauri ER; Alku P; Sala E; Sihvo M
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1997; 49(5):247-63. PubMed ID: 9311159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Voice source differences between registers in female musical theater singers.
Björkner E; Sundberg J; Cleveland T; Stone E
J Voice; 2006 Jun; 20(2):187-97. PubMed ID: 16051463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Voice source characteristics in Mongolian "throat singing" studied with high-speed imaging technique, acoustic spectra, and inverse filtering.
Lindestad PA; Södersten M; Merker B; Granqvist S
J Voice; 2001 Mar; 15(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 12269637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Contact quotient versus closed quotient: a comparative study on professional male singers.
Lã FM; Sundberg J
J Voice; 2015 Mar; 29(2):148-54. PubMed ID: 25510160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. On the use of the derivative of electroglottographic signals for characterization of nonpathological phonation.
Henrich N; d'Alessandro C; Doval B; Castellengo M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Mar; 115(3):1321-32. PubMed ID: 15058354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Measures of phonation type in Hmong.
Huffman MK
J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Feb; 81(2):495-504. PubMed ID: 3558967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Musical theater and opera singing--why so different? A study of subglottal pressure, voice source, and formant frequency characteristics.
Björkner E
J Voice; 2008 Sep; 22(5):533-40. PubMed ID: 17485197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of Glottal Inverse Filtering Algorithms Using a Physiologically Based Articulatory Speech Synthesizer.
Chien YR; Mehta DD; Guðnason J; Zañartu M; Quatieri TF
IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Process; 2017 Aug; 25(8):1718-1730. PubMed ID: 34268444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Source-filter comparison of measurements of fundamental frequency perturbation and amplitude perturbation for synthesized voice signals.
Murphy P
J Voice; 2008 Mar; 22(2):125-37. PubMed ID: 17147983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An amplitude quotient based method to analyze changes in the shape of the glottal pulse in the regulation of vocal intensity.
Alku P; Airas M; Björkner E; Sundberg J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Aug; 120(2):1052-62. PubMed ID: 16938991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Objective Characterization of Phonation Type Using Amplitude of Flow Glottogram Pulse and of Voice Source Fundamental.
Sundberg J
J Voice; 2022 Jan; 36(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 32402665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Soft phonation in the male singing voice: a preliminary study.
Miller DG; Schutte HK; Doing J
J Voice; 2001 Dec; 15(4):483-91. PubMed ID: 11792024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Some phonatory and resonatory characteristics of the rock, pop, soul, and Swedish dance band styles of singing.
Borch DZ; Sundberg J
J Voice; 2011 Sep; 25(5):532-7. PubMed ID: 20926250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Parameterization of the glottal area, glottal flow, and vocal fold contact area.
Titze IR
J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Feb; 75(2):570-80. PubMed ID: 6699296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The relationship among voice onset, voice quality, and fundamental frequency: a dynamical perspective.
Steinhauer K; Grayhack JP; Smiley-Oyen AL; Shaiman S; McNeil MR
J Voice; 2004 Dec; 18(4):432-42. PubMed ID: 15567045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Acoustic analysis of voice in normal and high pitch phonation: a comparative study.
Aithal VU; Bellur R; John S; Varghese C; Guddattu V
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2012; 64(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 22076072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Electroglottographic contact quotient in different phonation types using different amplitude threshold levels.
Kankare E; Laukkanen AM; Ilomäki I; Miettinen A; Pylkkänen T
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2012 Oct; 37(3):127-32. PubMed ID: 22432606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Substyles of belting: phonatory and resonatory characteristics.
Sundberg J; Thalén M; Popeil L
J Voice; 2012 Jan; 26(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 21439776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The pitch rise paradigm: a new task for real-time endoscopy of non-stationary phonation.
Rasp O; Lohscheller J; Doellinger M; Eysholdt U; Hoppe U
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2006; 58(3):175-85. PubMed ID: 16636565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
