1426 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16478745)
1. Gene expression profiling in breast cancer: understanding the molecular basis of histologic grade to improve prognosis.
Sotiriou C; Wirapati P; Loi S; Harris A; Fox S; Smeds J; Nordgren H; Farmer P; Praz V; Haibe-Kains B; Desmedt C; Larsimont D; Cardoso F; Peterse H; Nuyten D; Buyse M; Van de Vijver MJ; Bergh J; Piccart M; Delorenzi M
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Feb; 98(4):262-72. PubMed ID: 16478745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting features of breast cancer with gene expression patterns.
Lu X; Lu X; Wang ZC; Iglehart JD; Zhang X; Richardson AL
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Mar; 108(2):191-201. PubMed ID: 18297396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fuzzy logic selection as a new reliable tool to identify molecular grade signatures in breast cancer--the INNODIAG study.
Kempowsky-Hamon T; Valle C; Lacroix-Triki M; Hedjazi L; Trouilh L; Lamarre S; Labourdette D; Roger L; Mhamdi L; Dalenc F; Filleron T; Favre G; François JM; Le Lann MV; Anton-Leberre V
BMC Med Genomics; 2015 Feb; 8():3. PubMed ID: 25888889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The prognostic value of p53 and c-erb B-2 immunostaining is overrated for patients with lymph node negative breast carcinoma: a multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in 613 patients with a follow-up of 14-30 years.
Reed W; Hannisdal E; Boehler PJ; Gundersen S; Host H; Marthin J
Cancer; 2000 Feb; 88(4):804-13. PubMed ID: 10679650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Determining breast cancer histological grade from RNA-sequencing data.
Wang M; Klevebring D; Lindberg J; Czene K; Grönberg H; Rantalainen M
Breast Cancer Res; 2016 May; 18(1):48. PubMed ID: 27165105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relative Prognostic and Predictive Value of Gene Signature and Histologic Grade in Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer.
Iwamoto T; Kelly C; Mizoo T; Nogami T; Motoki T; Shien T; Taira N; Hayashi N; Niikura N; Fujiwara T; Doihara H; Matsuoka J
Clin Breast Cancer; 2016 Apr; 16(2):95-100.e1. PubMed ID: 26631838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Prognostic values of grading system for lymph vessel tumor emboli in patients with invasive breast carcinomas of no special type].
Yue M; Li F; Deng HY; Zhang LL; Liu YP
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2017 Oct; 39(10):754-758. PubMed ID: 29061019
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. High expression of long non-coding RNA MALAT1 in breast cancer is associated with poor relapse-free survival.
Wang Z; Katsaros D; Biglia N; Shen Y; Fu Y; Loo LWM; Jia W; Obata Y; Yu H
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Sep; 171(2):261-271. PubMed ID: 29845475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An online survival analysis tool to rapidly assess the effect of 22,277 genes on breast cancer prognosis using microarray data of 1,809 patients.
Györffy B; Lanczky A; Eklund AC; Denkert C; Budczies J; Li Q; Szallasi Z
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Oct; 123(3):725-31. PubMed ID: 20020197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic relevance of carcinoembryonic antigen and estrogen receptor status in breast cancer patients.
Esteban JM; Felder B; Ahn C; Simpson JF; Battifora H; Shively JE
Cancer; 1994 Sep; 74(5):1575-83. PubMed ID: 7914825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic and Therapeutic Significance of Adhesion-regulating Molecule 1 in Estrogen Receptor-positive Breast Cancer.
Wu W; Zhong J; Chen J; Niu P; Ding Y; Han S; Xu J; Dai L
Clin Breast Cancer; 2020 Apr; 20(2):131-144.e3. PubMed ID: 31669266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Challenges in projecting clustering results across gene expression-profiling datasets.
Lusa L; McShane LM; Reid JF; De Cecco L; Ambrogi F; Biganzoli E; Gariboldi M; Pierotti MA
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Nov; 99(22):1715-23. PubMed ID: 18000217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A qualitative transcriptional signature to reclassify histological grade of ER-positive breast cancer patients.
Li J; Jiang W; Liang Q; Liu G; Dai Y; Zheng H; Yang J; Cai H; Zheng G
BMC Genomics; 2020 Apr; 21(1):283. PubMed ID: 32252627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. BRAF/MEK Pathway is Associated With Breast Cancer in ER-dependent Mode and Improves ER Status-based Cancer Recurrence Prediction.
Liu D; Zhou K
Clin Breast Cancer; 2020 Feb; 20(1):41-50.e8. PubMed ID: 31547956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Expression profiling of ion channel genes predicts clinical outcome in breast cancer.
Ko JH; Ko EA; Gu W; Lim I; Bang H; Zhou T
Mol Cancer; 2013 Sep; 12(1):106. PubMed ID: 24053408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. RERG (Ras-like, oestrogen-regulated, growth-inhibitor) expression in breast cancer: a marker of ER-positive luminal-like subtype.
Habashy HO; Powe DG; Glaab E; Ball G; Spiteri I; Krasnogor N; Garibaldi JM; Rakha EA; Green AR; Caldas C; Ellis IO
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Jul; 128(2):315-26. PubMed ID: 20697807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relationship of histologic grade and histologic subtype with oncotype Dx recurrence score; retrospective review of 863 breast cancer oncotype Dx results.
Singh K; He X; Kalife ET; Ehdaivand S; Wang Y; Sung CJ
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Feb; 168(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 29230662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Enhanced prediction of breast cancer prognosis by evaluating expression of p53 and prostate-specific antigen in combination.
Yu H; Levesque MA; Clark GM; Diamandis EP
Br J Cancer; 1999 Oct; 81(3):490-5. PubMed ID: 10507775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Understanding the molecular basis of histologic grade.
Ignatiadis M; Sotiriou C
Pathobiology; 2008; 75(2):104-11. PubMed ID: 18544965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Molecular characteristics and metastasis predictor genes of triple-negative breast cancer: a clinical study of triple-negative breast carcinomas.
Kuo WH; Chang YY; Lai LC; Tsai MH; Hsiao CK; Chang KJ; Chuang EY
PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e45831. PubMed ID: 23049873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
