These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16479209)

  • 1. Effect of modification of shock-wave delivery on stone fragmentation.
    Talic RF; Rabah DM
    Curr Opin Urol; 2006 Mar; 16(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 16479209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of treatment strategy on stone comminution efficiency in shock wave lithotripsy.
    Zhou Y; Cocks FH; Preminger GM; Zhong P
    J Urol; 2004 Jul; 172(1):349-54. PubMed ID: 15201809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Limitations of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Madaan S; Joyce AD
    Curr Opin Urol; 2007 Mar; 17(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 17285020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improvement of stone comminution by slow delivery rate of shock waves in extracorporeal lithotripsy.
    Kato Y; Yamaguchi S; Hori J; Okuyama M; Kakizaki H
    Int J Urol; 2006 Dec; 13(12):1461-5. PubMed ID: 17118017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for urinary calculi: comparison of immediate and long-term effects.
    Carlson KJ; Dretler SP; Roth RA; Hatziandreu E; Gladstone K; Mulley AG
    J Stone Dis; 1993 Jan; 5(1):8-18. PubMed ID: 10148257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. An update.
    Wilson WT; Preminger GM
    Urol Clin North Am; 1990 Feb; 17(1):231-42. PubMed ID: 2407017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Renal injury during shock wave lithotripsy is significantly reduced by slowing the rate of shock wave delivery.
    Evan AP; McAteer JA; Connors BA; Blomgren PM; Lingeman JE
    BJU Int; 2007 Sep; 100(3):624-7; discussion 627-8. PubMed ID: 17550415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimizing the fragmentation and clearance after shock wave lithotripsy.
    Kekre NS; Kumar S
    Curr Opin Urol; 2008 Mar; 18(2):205-9. PubMed ID: 18303545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Update on shock wave lithotripsy technology.
    Auge BK; Preminger GM
    Curr Opin Urol; 2002 Jul; 12(4):287-90. PubMed ID: 12072648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does rate matter? The results of a randomized controlled trial of 60 versus 120 shocks per minute for shock wave lithotripsy of renal calculi.
    Davenport K; Minervini A; Keoghane S; Parkin J; Keeley FX; Timoney AG
    J Urol; 2006 Nov; 176(5):2055-8; discussion 2058. PubMed ID: 17070254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is pre-shock wave lithotripsy stenting necessary for ureteral stones with moderate or severe hydronephrosis?
    El-Assmy A; El-Nahas AR; Sheir KZ
    J Urol; 2006 Nov; 176(5):2059-62; discussion 2062. PubMed ID: 17070256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preoperative nomograms for predicting stone-free rate after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Kanao K; Nakashima J; Nakagawa K; Asakura H; Miyajima A; Oya M; Ohigashi T; Murai M
    J Urol; 2006 Oct; 176(4 Pt 1):1453-6; discussion 1456-7. PubMed ID: 16952658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Extra-corporal shock wave lithotripsy using the HM3 Dornier lithotripter with a modified shock wave generator. Initial clinical reports of experiences].
    Muschter R; Kutscher KR; Böhle A; Schmeller NT; Renner P; Bünner G; Hofstetter AG; Hofsäss S; Forssmann B
    Urologe A; 1987 Jan; 26(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 3576862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Strategies for improved shock wave lithotripsy.
    McAteer JA; Bailey MR; Williams JC; Cleveland RO; Evan AP
    Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2005 Dec; 57(4):271-87. PubMed ID: 16247349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A randomized, double-blind trial to compare shock wave frequencies of 60 and 120 shocks per minute for upper ureteral stones.
    Honey RJ; Schuler TD; Ghiculete D; Pace KT;
    J Urol; 2009 Oct; 182(4):1418-23. PubMed ID: 19683303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Single-center North American experience with wolf Piezolith 3000 in management of urinary calculi.
    Wang R; Faerber GJ; Roberts WW; Morris DS; Wolf JS
    Urology; 2009 May; 73(5):958-63. PubMed ID: 19278719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Results of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in young children.
    Mosaad A; El-Salamouni T
    J Lithotr Stone Dis; 1991 Apr; 3(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 10149156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Clinical experience and results in the treatment of 4402 patients with solitary urinary calculi with the extracorporeal shock wave lithotripter Dornier MFL-500].
    Palacios A; Rodrigues F; Soares MJ; Morais A; Mendes A; Pinheiro J
    Arch Esp Urol; 2007; 60(6):665-70. PubMed ID: 17847740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Shockwave lithotripsy: energy needed for fragmenting calculi].
    Drach GW
    Arch Esp Urol; 1989; 42 Suppl 1():3-6. PubMed ID: 2699546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimizing shock wave lithotripsy in the 21st century.
    Argyropoulos AN; Tolley DA
    Eur Urol; 2007 Aug; 52(2):344-52. PubMed ID: 17499914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.