BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

432 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16479548)

  • 21. Sample size determination for logistic regression revisited.
    Demidenko E
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(18):3385-97. PubMed ID: 17149799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. When was a "negative" clinical trial big enough? How many patients you needed depends on what you found.
    Detsky AS; Sackett DL
    Arch Intern Med; 1985 Apr; 145(4):709-12. PubMed ID: 3985731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Exact tests using two correlated binomial variables in contemporary cancer clinical trials.
    Yu J; Kepner JL; Iyer R
    Biom J; 2009 Dec; 51(6):899-914. PubMed ID: 20014199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of the statistical power for multiple tests: a case study.
    Yeo A; Qu Y
    Pharm Stat; 2009; 8(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 18381588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Estimates, power and sample size calculations for two-sample ordinal outcomes under before-after study designs.
    Strickland PA; Lu SE
    Stat Med; 2003 Jun; 22(11):1807-18. PubMed ID: 12754716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Multiple imputation for early stopping of a complex clinical trial.
    Betensky RA
    Biometrics; 1998 Mar; 54(1):229-42. PubMed ID: 9544518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A note on the sample size determination in two-period repeated measurements crossover design with application to clinical trials.
    Yue LQ; Roach P
    J Biopharm Stat; 1998 Nov; 8(4):577-84. PubMed ID: 9855035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Statistical significance, power and sample size--Part 2.
    Christley RM
    J Small Anim Pract; 2008 Jul; 49(7):321-2. PubMed ID: 18638056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bayesian sample size for exploratory clinical trials incorporating historical data.
    Whitehead J; Valdés-Márquez E; Johnson P; Graham G
    Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(13):2307-27. PubMed ID: 18069728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sample sizes based on the log-rank statistic in complex clinical trials.
    Lakatos E
    Biometrics; 1988 Mar; 44(1):229-41. PubMed ID: 3358991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Calculation of sample size for stroke trials assessing functional outcome: comparison of binary and ordinal approaches.
    Optimising Analysis of Stroke Trials Collaboration
    Int J Stroke; 2008 May; 3(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 18705999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Biostatistics in clinical trials: Part 2. Determining sample sizes for clinical trials.
    Ellenberg SS
    Oncology (Williston Park); 1989 Aug; 3(8):39-46; discussion 48, 51. PubMed ID: 2519197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sensitivity and specificity of clinical trials. Randomized v historical controls.
    Sacks HS; Chalmers TC; Smith H
    Arch Intern Med; 1983 Apr; 143(4):753-5. PubMed ID: 6838297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sample size calculations for comparative clinical trials with over-dispersed Poisson process data.
    Matsui S
    Stat Med; 2005 May; 24(9):1339-56. PubMed ID: 15568188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Estimation in flexible two stage designs.
    Brannath W; König F; Bauer P
    Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(19):3366-81. PubMed ID: 16220489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Power and sample size when multiple endpoints are considered.
    Senn S; Bretz F
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(3):161-70. PubMed ID: 17674404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Methods for one-sided testing of the difference between proportions and sample size considerations related to non-inferiority clinical trials.
    Dann RS; Koch GG
    Pharm Stat; 2008; 7(2):130-41. PubMed ID: 17526060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A sequential procedure for monitoring clinical trials against historical controls.
    Xiong X; Tan M; Boyett J
    Stat Med; 2007 Mar; 26(7):1497-511. PubMed ID: 16900551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The conditional binomial test revisited for clinical trials.
    Lei X; Davis D; Kuan L; Lee J; Oh S
    J Biopharm Stat; 1998 Nov; 8(4):533-43. PubMed ID: 9855032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Conducting a cost-effectiveness trial in oncology: justification and method].
    Lejeune C; Binquet C; Bonnetain F
    Bull Cancer; 2009 May; 96(5):603-7. PubMed ID: 19435689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.