200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16479697)
1. Planned Parenthood v. Sunquist.
Tennessee. Supreme Court
Wests South West Report; 2000; 38():1-52. PubMed ID: 16479697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tucson Woman's Clinic v. Eden.
United States. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Wests Fed Rep; 2004; 379():531-57. PubMed ID: 16477726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Legal aspects of abortion practice.
Goldman EB
Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Mar; 13(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 3709009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. WomanCare of Southfield, P.C. v. Granholm.
United States. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division
Wests Fed Suppl; 2001; 143():827-48. PubMed ID: 16479703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Planned Parenthood of Idaho v. Wasden.
United States. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Wests Fed Rep; 2004; 376():908-44. PubMed ID: 17225343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. North Florida Women's Health Services v. State.
Florida. Supreme Court
Wests South Report; 2003; 866():612-74. PubMed ID: 16479690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Criminal liability of physicians: an encroachment on the abortion right?
Barber RA
Am Crim Law Rev; 1981; 18(4):591-615. PubMed ID: 11655468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Fed Report; 1991 Oct; 947():682-727. PubMed ID: 11648596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
U.S. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Fed Suppl; 1990 Aug; 744():1323-98. PubMed ID: 11648591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Renee B. v. Florida Agency for Health Care Administration.
Florida. Supreme Court
Wests South Report; 2001; 790():1036-42. PubMed ID: 16479688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Planned Parenthood of Southern Arizona v. Lawall.
United States. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Wests Fed Rep; 2002; 307():783-94. PubMed ID: 16477720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Court reaffirms Roe but upholds restrictions.
Fam Plann Perspect; 1992; 24(4):174-7, 185. PubMed ID: 1526274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinic for Women, Inc. v. Brizzi.
Indiana. Court of Appeals
Wests North East Rep; 2004; 814():1042-60. PubMed ID: 16479700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. WomanCare of Southfield, P.C. v. Granholm.
United States. District Court, Michigan
Wests Fed Suppl; 2001; 143():849-55. PubMed ID: 16479702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simopoulos v. Virginia.
U.S. Supreme Court
U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1983 Jun; 462():506-22. PubMed ID: 12041277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
Peterfy A
J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Abortion and informed consent requirements.
Kapp MB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Sep; 144(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 7114096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hope Clinic v. Ryan.
United States. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Wests Fed Rep; 2001; 249():603-6. PubMed ID: 16482667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
U.S. Supreme Court
Wests Supreme Court Report; 1992 Jun; 112():2791-885. PubMed ID: 12041291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Karlin v. Foust.
U.S. District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Fed Suppl; 1997 Oct; 975():1177-235. PubMed ID: 11648430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
