227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16479759)
1. Peri-implant stress analysis in simulation models with or without trabecular bone structure.
Stegaroiu R; Watanabe N; Tanaka M; Ejiri S; Nomura S; Miyakawa O
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 16479759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis.
Qian L; Todo M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):877-86. PubMed ID: 19865628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of marginal bone resorption on stress around an implant--a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Kitamura E; Stegaroiu R; Nomura S; Miyakawa O
J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Apr; 32(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 15790383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bivariate evaluation of cylinder implant diameter and length: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Kong L; Sun Y; Hu K; Li D; Hou R; Yang J; Liu B
J Prosthodont; 2008 Jun; 17(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 18205741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Tada S; Stegaroiu R; Kitamura E; Miyakawa O; Kusakari H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):357-68. PubMed ID: 12814310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stress and strain distribution behavior in the bone due to the effect of cancellous bone, dental implant material and the bone height.
Hedia HS
Biomed Mater Eng; 2002; 12(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 12122235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of dental implants as orthodontic anchorage.
Gallas MM; Abeleira MT; Fernández JR; Burguera M
Eur J Orthod; 2005 Feb; 27(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 15743858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures.
Tanino F; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Minakuchi S
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17455444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Threaded versus porous-surfaced implants as anchorage units for orthodontic treatment: three-dimensional finite element analysis of peri-implant bone tissue stresses.
Pilliar RM; Sagals G; Meguid SA; Oyonarte R; Deporter DA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):879-89. PubMed ID: 17190297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Two dental implants designed for immediate loading: a finite element analysis.
Pierrisnard L; Hure G; Barquins M; Chappard D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 12074450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Numerical simulation of the effect of time-to-loading on peri-implant bone.
Akça K; Eser A; Canay S
Med Eng Phys; 2010 Jan; 32(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 19864171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Probabilistic analysis of peri-implant strain predictions as influenced by uncertainties in bone properties and occlusal forces.
Petrie CS; Williams JL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):611-9. PubMed ID: 17590159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Selection of the implant transgingival height for optimal biomechanical properties: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Sun Y; Kong L; Hu K; Xie C; Zhou H; Liu Y; Liu B
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 47(5):393-8. PubMed ID: 18977057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Numeric simulation of time-dependent remodeling of bone around loaded oral implants.
Eser A; Tonuk E; Akca K; Cehreli MC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):597-608. PubMed ID: 19885399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses.
Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of framework shape on the fracture strength of implant-supported all-ceramic fixed partial dentures in the molar region.
Tsumita M; Kokubo Y; Vult von Steyern P; Fukushima S
J Prosthodont; 2008 Jun; 17(4):274-85. PubMed ID: 18205740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of a cuneiform-geometry implant.
Cruz M; Wassall T; Toledo EM; Barra LP; Lemonge AC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):675-84. PubMed ID: 14579955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of loading frequency on implant failure under cyclic fatigue conditions.
Karl M; Kelly JR
Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1426-32. PubMed ID: 19643468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of a thin HA coating on the stress/strain distribution in bone around dental implants using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Aoki H; Ozeki K; Ohtani Y; Fukui Y; Asaoka T
Biomed Mater Eng; 2006; 16(3):157-69. PubMed ID: 16518015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
