These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16480932)

  • 1. Fraud in science--reflections on some whys and wherefores.
    Friedberg EC
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2006 Mar; 5(3):291-3. PubMed ID: 16480932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How to cope with fraud in science.
    New Sci; 1983 Jan; 97(1339):3. PubMed ID: 11655521
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Science, fraud and the Baltimore case.
    Bernstein J
    Commentary; 1998 Dec; 106(6):40-4. PubMed ID: 15986525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Responsibility of the faculty in scientific fraud].
    Evensen SA
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Sep; 127(17):2278. PubMed ID: 17828332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Research without fraud].
    Ekbom A
    Lakartidningen; 2007 Oct 3-9; 104(40):2851. PubMed ID: 17966797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Medical research fraud].
    Waldum H
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Mar; 126(7):935; author reply 935. PubMed ID: 16554892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The aftermath of scientific fraud.
    Bonetta L
    Cell; 2006 Mar; 124(5):873-5. PubMed ID: 16530031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A case of scientific misconduct: the cost of bad science.
    Broome ME
    Clin Nurse Spec; 2009; 23(5):268. PubMed ID: 19710574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Germany. Fraud investigations come up dry.
    Vogel G
    Science; 2003 Jul; 301(5630):150. PubMed ID: 12855778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frequent cases force China to face up to scientific fraud.
    Jia H
    Nat Med; 2006 Aug; 12(8):867. PubMed ID: 16892019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Investigation of scientific fraud. Statements from the Swedish Research Council not sufficiently normative].
    Werkö L
    Lakartidningen; 2006 Oct 25-31; 103(43):3288-91. PubMed ID: 17117661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the importance of fraud in science.
    Weinstein D
    Perspectives Prof; 1981; 1(3-4):4-6. PubMed ID: 11649377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ethical and legal considerations in a case of research fraud.
    Kvaal SI
    J Am Coll Dent; 2008; 75(2):29-35. PubMed ID: 18777891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Once again about certain ethical principles of science and research].
    Tsimmerman IaS
    Klin Med (Mosk); 2009; 87(2):4-7. PubMed ID: 19348291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cancer fraud case stuns research community, prompts reflection on peer review process.
    Vastag B
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Mar; 98(6):374-6. PubMed ID: 16537825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conscience, regulation and scientific misconduct.
    Lumley J
    Res Publica; 1994; 3(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 16619463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stop misbehaving!
    Neill US
    J Clin Invest; 2006 Jul; 116(7):1740-1. PubMed ID: 16823470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Scientific misconduct in Norwegian medical research].
    Bratlid D
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Jun; 127(13):1795-6. PubMed ID: 17599131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ghost story: at medical journals, writers paid by industry play big role.
    Mathews AW
    Wall St J (East Ed); 2005 Dec; ():A1, A8. PubMed ID: 16506304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A case of scientific misconduct.
    O'Malley P
    Clin Nurse Spec; 2009; 23(5):265-7. PubMed ID: 19710573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.