BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16481085)

  • 1. A left-ear disadvantage for the presentation of irrelevant sound: manipulations of task requirements and changing state.
    Hadlington LJ; Bridges AM; Beaman CP
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Jul; 61(2):159-71. PubMed ID: 16481085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory location in the irrelevant sound effect: The effects of presenting auditory stimuli to either the left ear, right ear or both ears.
    Hadlington L; Bridges AM; Darby RJ
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Aug; 55(3):545-57. PubMed ID: 15223201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hemispheric asymmetries in auditory distraction.
    Sörqvist P; Marsh JE; Jahncke H
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Nov; 74(2):79-87. PubMed ID: 20688422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech versus non-speech as irrelevant sound: controlling acoustic variation.
    Little JS; Martin FH; Thomson RH
    Biol Psychol; 2010 Sep; 85(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 20553792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Disruption of order information by irrelevant items: a serial recognition paradigm.
    Gisselgård J; Uddén J; Ingvar M; Petersson KM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Mar; 124(3):356-69. PubMed ID: 16777043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interference by process, not content, determines semantic auditory distraction.
    Marsh JE; Hughes RW; Jones DM
    Cognition; 2009 Jan; 110(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 19081558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Manipulations of irrelevant information: suffix effects with articulatory suppression and irrelevant speech.
    Surprenant AM; LeCompte DC; Neath I
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):325-48. PubMed ID: 10881609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Indispensable benefits and unavoidable costs of unattended sound for cognitive functioning.
    Hughes RW; Jones DM
    Noise Health; 2003; 6(21):63-76. PubMed ID: 14965454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Right hemisphere dominance for auditory attention and its modulation by eye position: an event related fMRI study.
    Petit L; Simon G; Joliot M; Andersson F; Bertin T; Zago L; Mellet E; Tzourio-Mazoyer N
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2007; 25(3-4):211-25. PubMed ID: 17943000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory memory and the irrelevant sound effect: Further evidence for changing-state disruption.
    Campbell T; Beaman CP; Berry DC
    Memory; 2002 May; 10(3):199-214. PubMed ID: 11958724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interactions between auditory 'what' and 'where' pathways revealed by enhanced near-threshold discrimination of frequency and position.
    Tardif E; Spierer L; Clarke S; Murray MM
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Mar; 46(4):958-66. PubMed ID: 18191423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of order incongruence between a task-irrelevant auditory sequence and a task-relevant visual sequence.
    Hughes RW; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Apr; 31(2):316-27. PubMed ID: 15826233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Irrelevant sound disrupts order information in free recall as in serial recall.
    Beaman CP; Jones DM
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1998 Aug; 51(3):615-36. PubMed ID: 9745380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Interhemispheric asymmetry of the auditory evoked potentials and mismatch negativities during sound source localization].
    Vaĭtulevich SF; Shestopalova LB
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 2009; 59(3):269-80. PubMed ID: 19591393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Serial recall of rhythms and verbal sequences: Impacts of concurrent tasks and irrelevant sound.
    Hall D; Gathercole SE
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Aug; 64(8):1580-92. PubMed ID: 21563018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sequential processing of interaural timing differences for sound source segregation and spatial localization: evidence from event-related cortical potentials.
    Johnson BW; Hautus MJ; Duff DJ; Clapp WC
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Jul; 44(4):541-51. PubMed ID: 17521376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Extinction of auditory stimuli in hemineglect: Space versus ear.
    Spierer L; Meuli R; Clarke S
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):540-51. PubMed ID: 16753189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interhemispheric support during demanding auditory signal-in-noise processing.
    Stracke H; Okamoto H; Pantev C
    Cereb Cortex; 2009 Jun; 19(6):1440-7. PubMed ID: 18936273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age-related differences in brain activity underlying working memory for spatial and nonspatial auditory information.
    Grady CL; Yu H; Alain C
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Jan; 18(1):189-99. PubMed ID: 17494060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hemispheric competence for auditory spatial representation.
    Spierer L; Bellmann-Thiran A; Maeder P; Murray MM; Clarke S
    Brain; 2009 Jul; 132(Pt 7):1953-66. PubMed ID: 19477962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.