BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16481698)

  • 1. Generalized head models for MEG/EEG: boundary element method beyond nested volumes.
    Kybic J; Clerc M; Faugeras O; Keriven R; Papadopoulo T
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(5):1333-46. PubMed ID: 16481698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fast multipole acceleration of the MEG/EEG boundary element method.
    Kybic J; Clerc M; Faugeras O; Keriven R; Papadopoulo T
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(19):4695-710. PubMed ID: 16177498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of the isolated problem approach for multi-compartment BEM models of electro-magnetic source imaging.
    Gençer NG; Akalin-Acar Z
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jul; 50(13):3007-22. PubMed ID: 15972977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bioelectromagnetic forward problem: isolated source approach revis(it)ed.
    Stenroos M; Sarvas J
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jun; 57(11):3517-35. PubMed ID: 22581305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of head shape variations among individuals on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse problems.
    von Ellenrieder N; Muravchik CH; Wagner M; Nehorai A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Mar; 56(3):587-97. PubMed ID: 19389682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of quasi-static magnetic reciprocity to finite element models of the MEG lead-field.
    Schimpf PH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Nov; 54(11):2082-8. PubMed ID: 18018704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An improved boundary element method for realistic volume-conductor modeling.
    Fuchs M; Drenckhahn R; Wischmann HA; Wagner M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Aug; 45(8):980-97. PubMed ID: 9691573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Direct reconstruction algorithm of current dipoles for vector magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography.
    Nara T; Oohama J; Hashimoto M; Takeda T; Ando S
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3859-79. PubMed ID: 17664582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Linear inverse solutions: simulations from a realistic head model in MEG.
    Soufflet L; Boeijinga PH
    Brain Topogr; 2005; 18(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 16341577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of tissue conductivity anisotropy on EEG/MEG field and return current computation in a realistic head model: a simulation and visualization study using high-resolution finite element modeling.
    Wolters CH; Anwander A; Tricoche X; Weinstein D; Koch MA; MacLeod RS
    Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):813-26. PubMed ID: 16364662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Symmetric BEM formulation for the M/EEG forward problem.
    Adde G; Clerc M; Faugeras O; Keriven R; Kybic J; Papadopoulo T
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2003 Jul; 18():524-35. PubMed ID: 15344485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analytic expansion of the EEG lead field for realistic volume conductors.
    Nolte G; Dassios G
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(16):3807-23. PubMed ID: 16077228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dipole models for the EEG and MEG.
    Schimpf PH; Ramon C; Haueisen J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 May; 49(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 12002172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MEG forward problem formulation using equivalent surface current densities.
    von Ellenrieder N; Muravchik CH; Nehorai A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jul; 52(7):1210-7. PubMed ID: 16041984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of the head model on EEG and MEG source connectivity analyses.
    Cho JH; Vorwerk J; Wolters CH; Knösche TR
    Neuroimage; 2015 Apr; 110():60-77. PubMed ID: 25638756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A meshless method for solving the EEG forward problem.
    von Ellenrieder N; Muravchik CH; Nehorai A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Feb; 52(2):249-57. PubMed ID: 15709662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Array response kernels for EEG and MEG in multilayer ellipsoidal geometry.
    Gutiérrez D; Nehorai A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 55(3):1103-11. PubMed ID: 18334402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dipole estimation errors due to differences in modeling anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
    Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Van Hese P; Delputte S; Lemahieu I
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(7):1877-94. PubMed ID: 18364544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A fast method to derive realistic BEM models for E/MEG source reconstruction.
    van't Ent D; de Munck JC; Kaas AL
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2001 Dec; 48(12):1434-43. PubMed ID: 11759924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of skull resistivity on the spatial resolutions of EEG and MEG.
    Malmivuo JA; Suihko VE
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Jul; 51(7):1276-80. PubMed ID: 15248545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.