248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16482132)
1. It's difficult to publish contradictory findings.
DeCoursey TE
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):784. PubMed ID: 16482132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Standards for papers on cloning.
Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):243. PubMed ID: 16421524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Penalties plus high-quality review to fight plagiarism.
Wittmaack K
Nature; 2005 Jul; 436(7047):24. PubMed ID: 16001039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Journals under pressure: publish, and be damned.
Adam D; Knight J
Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):772-6. PubMed ID: 12397323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Reviewers peering from under a pile of 'omics' data.
Nicholson JK
Nature; 2006 Apr; 440(7087):992. PubMed ID: 16625173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A simple system of checks and balances to cut fraud.
Yang X; Eggan K; Seidel G; Jaenisch R; Melton D
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):782. PubMed ID: 16482128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Bureaucracy won't change the character of a cheat.
Bentley P
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):782-4. PubMed ID: 16482126
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The trouble with replication.
Giles J
Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7101):344-7. PubMed ID: 16871184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Data audit would reduce unethical behaviour.
Shamoo AE
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):784. PubMed ID: 16482131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Should journals police scientific fraud?
Marris E
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7076):520-1. PubMed ID: 16452946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Reviewers' reports should in turn be peer reviewed.
List A
Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7098):26. PubMed ID: 16823432
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Sitting in judgement.
Check E
Nature; 2002 Sep; 419(6905):332-3. PubMed ID: 12353003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Chinese Academic Assessment and Incentive System.
Suo Q
Sci Eng Ethics; 2016 Feb; 22(1):297-9. PubMed ID: 25794900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact factors reward and promote excellence.
Lomnicki A
Nature; 2003 Jul; 424(6948):487. PubMed ID: 12891329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Three cheers for peers.
Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7073):118. PubMed ID: 16407911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The politics of publication.
Lawrence PA
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6929):259-61. PubMed ID: 12646895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The system rewards a dishonest approach.
Brookfield J
Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):480; discussion 480. PubMed ID: 12774095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Commentary: monitoring biological data.
Kritchevsky D
Account Res; 1990 Oct; 1(2):85-6. PubMed ID: 15991407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. China introduces sweeping reforms to crack down on academic misconduct.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2018 Jun; 558(7709):171. PubMed ID: 29895918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Scientific misconduct: tip of an iceberg or the elephant in the room?
Luther F
J Dent Res; 2010 Dec; 89(12):1364-7. PubMed ID: 20940367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
