248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16482132)
21. Corporate culture has no place in academia.
Hallonsten O
Nature; 2016 Oct; 538(7623):7. PubMed ID: 27708316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [Behind the scenes of scientific articles: defining categories of fraud and regulating cases].
Pontille D; Torny D
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2012 Aug; 60(4):247-53. PubMed ID: 22819062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Not-so-deep impact.
Nature; 2005 Jun; 435(7045):1003-4. PubMed ID: 15973362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Misconduct? It's all academic..
Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7125):240-1. PubMed ID: 17230159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Doctor admits Lancet study is fiction.
Marris E
Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):248-9. PubMed ID: 16421528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Next steps in the Schön affair.
Kennedy D
Science; 2002 Oct; 298(5593):495. PubMed ID: 12386303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. To publish or perish: how to review a manuscript.
Winck JC; Fonseca JA; Azevedo LF; Wedzicha JA
Rev Port Pneumol; 2011; 17(2):96-103. PubMed ID: 21477574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Journals should set a new standard in transparency.
Dellavalle RP; Lundahl K; Freeman SR; Schilling LM
Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7126):364. PubMed ID: 17251958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Fraud offers big rewards for relatively little risk.
Fenning TM
Nature; 2004 Jan; 427(6973):393. PubMed ID: 14749800
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Peer review: Close inspection.
Schiermeier Q
Nature; 2016 May; 533(7602):279-81. PubMed ID: 27200447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The joy of discovery.
de Duve C
Nature; 2010 Oct; 467(7317):S5. PubMed ID: 20944620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The peer review process (aka peer reviewology).
Yucha CB
Biol Res Nurs; 2002 Oct; 4(2):71-2. PubMed ID: 12408212
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. How do impact factors relate to the real world?
Skórka P
Nature; 2003 Oct; 425(6959):661. PubMed ID: 14562076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Restoring integrity to the scientific literature: lowering the bar to raise our standards.
Gordon SE
J Gen Physiol; 2014 Dec; 144(6):495-7. PubMed ID: 25422501
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Identity Theft in the Academic World Leads to Junk Science.
Dadkhah M; Lagzian M; Borchardt G
Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Feb; 24(1):287-290. PubMed ID: 28074375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Peers under pressure.
Dalton R
Nature; 2001 Sep; 413(6852):102-4. PubMed ID: 11557944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Editors are meant to be judges, not postmen.
Michell B
Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):479-80; discussion 480. PubMed ID: 12774094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Making an impact.
Wu R
Nature; 2004 Mar; 428(6979):206-7. PubMed ID: 15014507
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The real dirty secret of academic publishing.
Svetlov V
Nature; 2004 Oct; 431(7011):897. PubMed ID: 15496892
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Science, lies and video-taped experiments.
Clark TD
Nature; 2017 Feb; 542(7640):139. PubMed ID: 28179685
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
