These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16482132)

  • 61. Q&A: The global view.
    Dong-Yan J; Cheung F
    Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7549):S37. PubMed ID: 25924200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Watch out for cheats in citation game.
    Biagioli M
    Nature; 2016 Jul; 535(7611):201. PubMed ID: 27411599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Chilean researchers unhappy following investigation of star neuroscientist.
    Mega ER
    Nature; 2021 Oct; 598(7881):396-397. PubMed ID: 34646032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. The secrets of success.
    Smaglik P
    Nature; 2004 Nov; 432(7014):253. PubMed ID: 15538377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Journals: how to decide what's worth publishing.
    Jefferson T; Shashok K
    Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):209-10. PubMed ID: 12529609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Peer-review system could gain from author feedback.
    Korngreen A
    Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7066):282. PubMed ID: 16292281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. [Publication ethics--responsibility of all].
    Staff A; Rørtveit G
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2010 Feb; 130(3):259. PubMed ID: 20160762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Peer review could be improved by market forces.
    Jaffe K
    Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):782. PubMed ID: 16482127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Ethical issues related to publishing and reviewing.
    Morgan GA; Harmon RJ; Gliner JA
    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 2001 Dec; 40(12):1476-8. PubMed ID: 11765295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Ethical guidelines to publication of chemical research.
    Editors of the Publications Division, Ameican Chemical Society
    Biomacromolecules; 2001; 2(1):19A-21A. PubMed ID: 12442743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Rewarding the quantity of peer review could harm biomedical research.
    Al-Khatib A; Teixeira da Silva JA
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2019 Jun; 29(2):020201. PubMed ID: 31015781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Impact factors: target the funding bodies.
    Insall R
    Nature; 2003 Jun; 423(6940):585. PubMed ID: 12789312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Journals: redundant publications are bad news.
    Mojon-Azzi SM; Jiang X; Wagner U; Mojon DS
    Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):209. PubMed ID: 12529610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Statement of purpose revisited.
    Organ CH
    Arch Surg; 2001 Sep; 136(9):989. PubMed ID: 11529818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Author, author burning bright; author, author are you right?
    Pederson T
    FASEB J; 2006 Apr; 20(6):600. PubMed ID: 16581966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Predatory publishers are corrupting open access.
    Beall J
    Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7415):179. PubMed ID: 22972258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Training peer reviewers.
    Mackey DA
    Nature; 2006 Oct; 443(7113):880. PubMed ID: 17106961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Publication ethics.
    Hays JC
    Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):205-6. PubMed ID: 19386055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. NIH responds to critics on peer review.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7197):835. PubMed ID: 18548033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Peer review in action: the contribution of referees to advancing reliable knowledge.
    Hanks G
    Palliat Med; 2005 Jul; 19(5):359-70. PubMed ID: 16111059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.