BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

398 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16482133)

  • 1. Pressure also leads to worthless publications.
    de Carvalho LB
    Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):784. PubMed ID: 16482133
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three cheers for peers.
    Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7073):118. PubMed ID: 16407911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The politics of publication.
    Lawrence PA
    Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6929):259-61. PubMed ID: 12646895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Editors are meant to be judges, not postmen.
    Michell B
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):479-80; discussion 480. PubMed ID: 12774094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The do's and don't's of submitting scientific papers.
    Walsh PJ; Mommsen TP; Nilsson GE
    Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol; 2009 Mar; 152(3):203-4. PubMed ID: 19146976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact factors reward and promote excellence.
    Lomnicki A
    Nature; 2003 Jul; 424(6948):487. PubMed ID: 12891329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The real dirty secret of academic publishing.
    Svetlov V
    Nature; 2004 Oct; 431(7011):897. PubMed ID: 15496892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Penalties plus high-quality review to fight plagiarism.
    Wittmaack K
    Nature; 2005 Jul; 436(7047):24. PubMed ID: 16001039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predatory publishers are corrupting open access.
    Beall J
    Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7415):179. PubMed ID: 22972258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bad peer reviewers.
    Nature; 2001 Sep; 413(6852):93. PubMed ID: 11557930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ethical guidelines to publication of chemical research.
    Editors of the Publications Division, Ameican Chemical Society
    Biomacromolecules; 2001; 2(1):19A-21A. PubMed ID: 12442743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Editorial: an age of enlightenment or information overload?
    Davis TR
    J Hand Surg Br; 2004 Dec; 29(6):521-9. PubMed ID: 15542210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Challenging the tyranny of impact factors.
    Colquhoun D
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):479; discussion 480. PubMed ID: 12774093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Journals: how to decide what's worth publishing.
    Jefferson T; Shashok K
    Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):209-10. PubMed ID: 12529609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Journals submit to scrutiny of their peer-review process.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):252. PubMed ID: 16421533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Journals under pressure: publish, and be damned.
    Adam D; Knight J
    Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):772-6. PubMed ID: 12397323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scientific publishing. Peer review and quality: a dubious connection?
    Enserink M
    Science; 2001 Sep; 293(5538):2187-8. PubMed ID: 11567115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peers under pressure.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 2001 Sep; 413(6852):102-4. PubMed ID: 11557944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Journals: redundant publications are bad news.
    Mojon-Azzi SM; Jiang X; Wagner U; Mojon DS
    Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):209. PubMed ID: 12529610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact factors aren't top journals' sole attraction.
    Törnqvist TE
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):480. PubMed ID: 12774096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.