398 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16482133)
21. CONSORT and beyond.
Blackstone EH
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Aug; 132(2):229-32. PubMed ID: 16872939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The system rewards a dishonest approach.
Brookfield J
Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):480; discussion 480. PubMed ID: 12774095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Doctor admits Lancet study is fiction.
Marris E
Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):248-9. PubMed ID: 16421528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. How do impact factors relate to the real world?
Skórka P
Nature; 2003 Oct; 425(6959):661. PubMed ID: 14562076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Making sure corrections don't vanish online.
Shim EH; Parekh V
Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7029):18; discussion 18. PubMed ID: 15744271
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Journals should set a new standard in transparency.
Dellavalle RP; Lundahl K; Freeman SR; Schilling LM
Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7126):364. PubMed ID: 17251958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Innovation, journal reviewers, and journal editors the game is worth the candle.
Popp RL
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Oct; 46(7):1360-1. PubMed ID: 16198856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. QUAD system offers fair shares to all authors.
Verhagen JV; Wallace KJ; Collins SC; Scott TR
Nature; 2003 Dec; 426(6967):602. PubMed ID: 14668833
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Peer review and refereeing in science.
Lore W
East Afr Med J; 1995 May; 72(5):335-7. PubMed ID: 7555893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [To improve transparency of biomedical publications].
Watine J; Friedberg B
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2004; 62(1):5-6. PubMed ID: 15047484
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Who is afraid of reviewers' comments? Or, why anything can be published and anything can be cited.
Ioannidis JP; Tatsioni A; Karassa FB
Eur J Clin Invest; 2010 Apr; 40(4):285-7. PubMed ID: 20486989
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Reviewing peer review: the three reviewers you meet at submission time.
Clarke SP
Can J Nurs Res; 2006 Dec; 38(4):5-9. PubMed ID: 17342873
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Financial interests are not the only bias factor.
Gori GB
Nature; 2001 Oct; 413(6856):565. PubMed ID: 11595913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Swift publication would reward good reviewers.
Koonin EV
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6930):374. PubMed ID: 12660754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [Scientific reporting guidelines].
Nylenna M
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Nov; 129(22):2340. PubMed ID: 19935931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Dangers of over-dependence on peer-reviewed publication.
Nature; 1999 Oct; 401(6755):727. PubMed ID: 10548083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The impact of the impact factor.
Manske PR
J Hand Surg Am; 2004 Nov; 29(6):983-6. PubMed ID: 15576205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Quality in epidemiological research: should we be submitting papers before we have the results and submitting more hypothesis-generating research?
Lawlor DA
Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Oct; 36(5):940-3. PubMed ID: 17875575
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. ["Predatory publishers"].
Olsson H
Lakartidningen; 2012 Nov 21-27; 109(47):2136. PubMed ID: 23330475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Peer review: recognition via year-end statements.
van Loon AJ
Nature; 2003 May; 423(6936):116. PubMed ID: 12736656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
