These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

399 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16482133)

  • 41. Physical & occupational therapy in pediatrics.
    Law M
    Phys Occup Ther Pediatr; 2001; 21(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 11715800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Microarray standards at last.
    Nature; 2002 Sep; 419(6905):323. PubMed ID: 12352992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. HIV denialists will exploit any journal's tolerance.
    Moore JP
    Nature; 2004 Feb; 427(6977):777. PubMed ID: 14985731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Peer review could be improved by market forces.
    Jaffe K
    Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):782. PubMed ID: 16482127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Learning to review.
    Freedman R
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1599-600. PubMed ID: 20031100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Ensuring the quality of peer-review process.
    Afifi M
    Saudi Med J; 2006 Aug; 27(8):1253. PubMed ID: 16883466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. R-E-S-P-E-C-T: you tell 'em, Aretha!
    Daunert S
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2004 Jan; 378(1):5-6. PubMed ID: 14615867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Keeping peer-reviewed publication relevant in the internet age.
    Randleman JB
    J Refract Surg; 2012 Jul; 28(7):447-8. PubMed ID: 22767161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. New committee to oversee relationship between CMA, CMAJ.
    Sullivan P
    CMAJ; 2003 Feb; 168(3):332. PubMed ID: 12566356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Competition in biology: it's a scoop!
    Pearson H
    Nature; 2003 Nov; 426(6964):222-3. PubMed ID: 14628017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Reviewers' reports should in turn be peer reviewed.
    List A
    Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7098):26. PubMed ID: 16823432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Impact factors: target the funding bodies.
    Insall R
    Nature; 2003 Jun; 423(6940):585. PubMed ID: 12789312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Not-so-deep impact.
    Nature; 2005 Jun; 435(7045):1003-4. PubMed ID: 15973362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Standards for ethical publication.
    Johnson JT; Niparko JK; Levine PA; Kennedy DW; Rudy SF; Weber P; Weber RS; Benninger MS; Rosenfeld RM; Ruben RJ; Smith RJ; Sataloff RT; Weir N
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2007; 28(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 17162121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Parasitology thanks the Referees of 2011.
    Phillips S
    Parasitology; 2012 Jun; 139(7):825. PubMed ID: 22640992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Prospect of human cloning poses dilemma for journals.
    Pearson H
    Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):199. PubMed ID: 12529602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Peer review and the rewards of open access.
    Newmark P
    Nature; 2003 Apr; 422(6933):661. PubMed ID: 12700733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Confidentiality.
    Guenin LM
    Science; 1996 Mar; 271(5257):1790. PubMed ID: 8596940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. End the wasteful tyranny of reviewer experiments.
    Ploegh H
    Nature; 2011 Apr; 472(7344):391. PubMed ID: 21525890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Why and how to avoid a desk-rejection.
    Lake ET
    Res Nurs Health; 2020 Apr; 43(2):141-142. PubMed ID: 32103510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.