These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

395 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16482133)

  • 61. Publication ethics.
    Hays JC
    Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):205-6. PubMed ID: 19386055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. A bit confused.
    Gravenstein N; Rice MJ
    Anesth Analg; 2011 Jun; 112(6):1509; author reply 1509-10. PubMed ID: 21613202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. A look inside the Pharos review process.
    Harris ED
    Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 2003; 66(2):36-7. PubMed ID: 12838637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Beyond the language barrier.
    Umakantha N
    Nature; 1997 Feb; 385(6619):764. PubMed ID: 9039902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. The trouble with replication.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7101):344-7. PubMed ID: 16871184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. [Alibi of the researcher. A reflection on publications and lists of publications].
    Rehfeld JF
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2000 May; 162(18):2571-4. PubMed ID: 10846960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Statistically significant.
    Nat Med; 2005 Jan; 11(1):1. PubMed ID: 15635418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Double check casts doubt on statistics in published papers.
    Pearson H
    Nature; 2004 Jun; 429(6991):490. PubMed ID: 15175712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. [Which scientific article is best qualified for publication?].
    Barzilai M
    Harefuah; 1997 Jul; 133(1-2):25-6. PubMed ID: 9332053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Open access mandate threatens dissemination of scientific information.
    McMullan E
    J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):72-4. PubMed ID: 18347464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Should journals police scientific fraud?
    Marris E
    Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7076):520-1. PubMed ID: 16452946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Cash-per-publication..
    Nature; 2006 Jun; 441(7095):786. PubMed ID: 16778844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Journals tighten up on biosecurity.
    Check E
    Nature; 2003 Feb; 421(6925):774. PubMed ID: 12594467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Structure and format of peer-reviewed scientific manuscripts.
    Manske PR
    J Hand Surg Am; 2006 Sep; 31(7):1051-5. PubMed ID: 16945702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Why are people reluctant to join in open review?
    Liu SV
    Nature; 2007 Jun; 447(7148):1052. PubMed ID: 17597736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Journals: impact factors are too highly valued.
    Davies J
    Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):210. PubMed ID: 12529611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. The crisis in scholarly publishing: open access to the rescue?
    Oren GA
    J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 18347450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Improving the reporting quality of randomised controlled trials in surgery.
    Carney S
    Int J Surg; 2007 Dec; 5(6):376. PubMed ID: 18063433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. [Knowledge on feet of clay].
    Dahlqvist R
    Lakartidningen; 2008 May 7-13; 105(19):1405-6. PubMed ID: 18574980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. The authors' challenge.
    Serruys PW
    EuroIntervention; 2013 Jan; 8(9):995. PubMed ID: 23339802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.