These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16482455)

  • 1. State-of-the-art on cone beam CT imaging for preoperative planning of implant placement.
    Guerrero ME; Jacobs R; Loubele M; Schutyser F; Suetens P; van Steenberghe D
    Clin Oral Investig; 2006 Mar; 10(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16482455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dental imaging in implant treatment planning.
    Chan HL; Misch K; Wang HL
    Implant Dent; 2010 Aug; 19(4):288-98. PubMed ID: 20683285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dental cone beam computed tomography: justification for use in planning oral implant placement.
    Jacobs R; Quirynen M
    Periodontol 2000; 2014 Oct; 66(1):203-13. PubMed ID: 25123769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of implant placement based on pre-surgical planning of three-dimensional cone-beam images: a pilot study.
    Van Assche N; van Steenberghe D; Guerrero ME; Hirsch E; Schutyser F; Quirynen M; Jacobs R
    J Clin Periodontol; 2007 Sep; 34(9):816-21. PubMed ID: 17716317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: current concepts, indications and limitations for clinical practice and research.
    Bornstein MM; Horner K; Jacobs R
    Periodontol 2000; 2017 Feb; 73(1):51-72. PubMed ID: 28000270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Panoramic images versus three-dimensional planning software for oral implant planning in atrophied posterior maxillary: a clinical radiological study.
    Fortin T; Camby E; Alik M; Isidori M; Bouchet H
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 21477064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cone beam computed tomography radiation dose and image quality assessments.
    Lofthag-Hansen S
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2010; (209):4-55. PubMed ID: 21229915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cone beam CT for pre-surgical assessment of implant sites.
    Hatcher DC; Dial C; Mayorga C
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2003 Nov; 31(11):825-33. PubMed ID: 14696834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dental implant imaging: TeraRecon's Dental 3D Cone Beam Computed Tomography System.
    Garg AK
    Dent Implantol Update; 2007 Jun; 18(6):41-5. PubMed ID: 17682685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use.
    Jacobs R; Salmon B; Codari M; Hassan B; Bornstein MM
    BMC Oral Health; 2018 May; 18(1):88. PubMed ID: 29764458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital technologies for dental implant treatment planning and guided surgery.
    Greenberg AM
    Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2015 May; 27(2):319-40. PubMed ID: 25951962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Presurgical implant-site assessment and restoratively driven digital planning.
    Scherer MD
    Dent Clin North Am; 2014 Jul; 58(3):561-95. PubMed ID: 24993924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Absorbed and effective doses from cone beam volumetric imaging for implant planning.
    Okano T; Harata Y; Sugihara Y; Sakaino R; Tsuchida R; Iwai K; Seki K; Araki K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Feb; 38(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 19176649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants.
    Ersoy AE; Turkyilmaz I; Ozan O; McGlumphy EA
    J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1339-45. PubMed ID: 18672982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing applications using CT and cone beam CT scanning technology.
    Ganz SD
    Dent Clin North Am; 2008 Oct; 52(4):777-808, vii. PubMed ID: 18805229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiographic stents: integrating treatment planning and implant placement.
    De Kok IJ; Thalji G; Bryington M; Cooper LF
    Dent Clin North Am; 2014 Jan; 58(1):181-92. PubMed ID: 24286652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiologic techniques using CBCT and 3-D treatment planning for implant placement.
    Peck JN; Conte GJ
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2008 Apr; 36(4):287-90, 292-4, 296-7. PubMed ID: 18481625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the difference in accuracy between implant placement by virtual planning data and surgical guide templates versus the conventional free-hand method - a combined in vivo - in vitro technique using cone-beam CT (Part II).
    Nickenig HJ; Wichmann M; Hamel J; Schlegel KA; Eitner S
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Oct; 38(7):488-93. PubMed ID: 19939691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conventional CT and cone beam CT for improved dental diagnostics and implant planning.
    Ganz SD
    Dent Implantol Update; 2005 Dec; 16(12):89-95. PubMed ID: 16422471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Enhancing implant surgery planning via computerized image processing.
    Cucchiara R; Franchini F; Lamma A; Lamma E; Sansoni T; Sarti E
    Int J Comput Dent; 2001 Jan; 4(1):9-24. PubMed ID: 11441568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.