These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16482674)

  • 1. Digital and film mammography.
    Keen JD
    N Engl J Med; 2006 Feb; 354(7):765-7; author reply 765-7. PubMed ID: 16482674
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening.
    Pisano ED; Gatsonis C; Hendrick E; Yaffe M; Baum JK; Acharyya S; Conant EF; Fajardo LL; Bassett L; D'Orsi C; Jong R; Rebner M;
    N Engl J Med; 2005 Oct; 353(17):1773-83. PubMed ID: 16169887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital and film mammography.
    Crystal P; Strano S
    N Engl J Med; 2006 Feb; 354(7):765-7; author reply 765-7. PubMed ID: 16481649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Status of mammography after the Digital Mammography Imaging Screening Trial: digital versus film.
    Dershaw DD
    Breast J; 2006; 12(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 16509833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic accuracy of Fischer Senoscan Digital Mammography versus screen-film mammography in a diagnostic mammography population.
    Cole E; Pisano ED; Brown M; Kuzmiak C; Braeuning MP; Kim HH; Jong R; Walsh R
    Acad Radiol; 2004 Aug; 11(8):879-86. PubMed ID: 15288038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of full-field digital mammography and film-screen mammography: image quality and lesion detection.
    Fischmann A; Siegmann KC; Wersebe A; Claussen CD; Müller-Schimpfle M
    Br J Radiol; 2005 Apr; 78(928):312-5. PubMed ID: 15774591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Summaries for patients: the accuracy of film versus digital screening mammography.
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Oct; 155(8):I30. PubMed ID: 22007060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital mammography.
    D'Orsi CJ
    Curr Womens Health Rep; 2002 Apr; 2(2):124-7. PubMed ID: 12116601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Point/Counterpoint. Film mammography for breast cancer screening in younger women is no longer appropriate because of the demonstrated superiority of digital mammography for this age group.
    Yaffe MJ; Barnes GT; Orton CG
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):3979-82. PubMed ID: 17153375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study.
    Skaane P; Balleyguier C; Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Piguet JC; Young K; Niklason LT
    Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16100086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital mammography: are there advantages in screening for breast cancer?
    Nees AV
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Apr; 15(4):401-7. PubMed ID: 18342763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two-modality mammography may confer an advantage over either full-field digital mammography or screen-film mammography.
    Glueck DH; Lamb MM; Lewin JM; Pisano ED
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):670-6. PubMed ID: 17502256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection and characterization of simulated small masses.
    Yang WT; Lai CJ; Whitman GJ; Murphy WA; Dryden MJ; Kushwaha AC; Sahin AA; Johnston D; Dempsey PJ; Shaw CC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):W576-81. PubMed ID: 17114508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts.
    Del Turco MR; Mantellini P; Ciatto S; Bonardi R; Martinelli F; Lazzari B; Houssami N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Oct; 189(4):860-6. PubMed ID: 17885057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Digital mammography].
    Rieber A; Kühn T; Nüssle K; Brambs HJ
    Rontgenpraxis; 2001; 53(5):196-9. PubMed ID: 11341015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of calcification specificity in digital mammography using soft-copy display versus screen-film mammography.
    Kim HH; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Jiroutek MR; Muller KE; Zheng Y; Kuzmiak CM; Koomen MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jul; 187(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 16794154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer.
    Lewin JM; D'Orsi CJ; Hendrick RE; Moss LJ; Isaacs PK; Karellas A; Cutter GR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Sep; 179(3):671-7. PubMed ID: 12185042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tests for breast cancer. Mammography is going digital. But is it better than film?
    Harv Health Lett; 2007 May; 32(7):4-5. PubMed ID: 17575613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography.
    Poplack SP; Tosteson TD; Kogel CA; Nagy HM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Sep; 189(3):616-23. PubMed ID: 17715109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital mammography: coming of age.
    Morin RL; Maidment AD
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Sep; 2(9):798-801. PubMed ID: 17411931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.