398 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16483303)
1. Guidelines for surgical audit in Australia and New Zealand.
Watters DA; Green AJ; van Rij A
ANZ J Surg; 2006; 76(1-2):78-83. PubMed ID: 16483303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical audits: why and for whom.
Boult M; Maddern GJ
ANZ J Surg; 2007 Jul; 77(7):572-8. PubMed ID: 17610696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving surgical outcomes for patients with cancer: an Australian perspective.
Crowe P
J Surg Oncol; 2009 Jun; 99(8):478-80. PubMed ID: 19466736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Commentary: how surgical audits can be used to promote the update of surgical evidence.
Wang J; Boult M; Roder D; Babidge W; Kollias J; Maddern G
ANZ J Surg; 2008 Jun; 78(6):437-8. PubMed ID: 18522561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of the Australasian vascular surgical audit.
Bourke BM; Beiles CB; Thomson IA; Grigg MJ; Fitridge R
J Vasc Surg; 2012 Jan; 55(1):164-9. PubMed ID: 21906906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surgical outcomes research: a progression from performance audits, to assessment of administrative databases, to prospective risk-adjusted analysis - how far have we come?
Morrato EH; Dillon P; Ziegler M
Curr Opin Pediatr; 2008 Jun; 20(3):320-5. PubMed ID: 18475103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of a real-time peer review audit on patient management in a radiation oncology department.
Boxer M; Forstner D; Kneebone A; Delaney G; Koh ES; Fuller M; Kaadan N
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Aug; 53(4):405-11. PubMed ID: 19695048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Requirements for trainee logbooks.
Watters DA; Green AJ; van Rij A
ANZ J Surg; 2006 Mar; 76(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 16626362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. National Breast Cancer Audit: establishing a web-based data system.
Boult M; Cuncins-Hearn A; Tyson S; Kollias J; Babidge W; Maddern G
ANZ J Surg; 2005 Oct; 75(10):844-7. PubMed ID: 16176221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The surgical trainee log we need: minimum of work, maximum of output.
Merry C; Goodall-Wilson D; Guest G; Papas C; Selvidge J; Watters DA
ANZ J Surg; 2006 Mar; 76(3):185-9. PubMed ID: 16626363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
Shiloach M; Frencher SK; Steeger JE; Rowell KS; Bartzokis K; Tomeh MG; Richards KE; Ko CY; Hall BL
J Am Coll Surg; 2010 Jan; 210(1):6-16. PubMed ID: 20123325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Time to CUSUM: simplified reporting of outcomes in colorectal surgery.
Bowles TA; Watters DA
ANZ J Surg; 2007 Jul; 77(7):587-91. PubMed ID: 17610699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Informatics and the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: automated processes could replace manual record review.
Hanauer DA; Englesbe MJ; Cowan JA; Campbell DA
J Am Coll Surg; 2009 Jan; 208(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 19228500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Providers and consumers support the Western Australian Audit of Surgical Mortality.
Semmens JB; Mountain JA; Sanfilippo FM; Barraclough JY; McKenzie A; Mukhtar SA; Haynes NS; Aitken RJ
ANZ J Surg; 2006 Jun; 76(6):442-7. PubMed ID: 16768765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Guide to the assessment of competence and performance in practising surgeons.
Dickinson I; Watters D; Graham I; Montgomery P; Collins J
ANZ J Surg; 2009 Mar; 79(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 19317789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improvement in neonatal intensive care in Northern Ireland through sharing of audit data.
Jenkins J; Alderdice F; McCall E;
Qual Saf Health Care; 2005 Jun; 14(3):202-6. PubMed ID: 15933318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical audit at the heart of clinical effectiveness.
Burnett AC; Winyard G
J Qual Clin Pract; 1998 Mar; 18(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 9563557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The ADIPS pilot National Diabetes in Pregnancy Audit Project.
Simmons D; Cheung NW; McIntyre HD; Flack JR; Lagstrom J; Bond D; Johnson E; Wolmarans L; Wein P; Sinha AK;
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Jun; 47(3):198-206. PubMed ID: 17550486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
