These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

400 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16483553)

  • 1. Multisensory interactions follow the hands across the midline: evidence from a non-spatial visual-tactile congruency task.
    Holmes NP; Sanabria D; Calvert GA; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1077(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 16483553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial coordinate systems for tactile spatial attention depend on developmental vision: evidence from event-related potentials in sighted and congenitally blind adult humans.
    Röder B; Föcker J; Hötting K; Spence C
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Aug; 28(3):475-83. PubMed ID: 18702719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the inability to ignore touch when responding to vision in the crossmodal congruency task.
    Spence C; Walton M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005; 118(1-2):47-70. PubMed ID: 15627409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mutual influences of intermodal visual/tactile apparent motion and auditory motion with uncrossed and crossed arms.
    Jiang Y; Chen L
    Multisens Res; 2013; 26(1-2):19-51. PubMed ID: 23713198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tactile selective attention and body posture: assessing the multisensory contributions of vision and proprioception.
    Soto-Faraco S; Ronald A; Spence C
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Oct; 66(7):1077-94. PubMed ID: 15751467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial constraints on visual-tactile cross-modal distractor congruency effects.
    Spence C; Pavani F; Driver J
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2004 Jun; 4(2):148-69. PubMed ID: 15460922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Crossing the hands disrupts tactile spatial attention but not motor attention: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Gherri E; Forster B
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jul; 50(9):2303-16. PubMed ID: 22683449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tactile remapping beyond space.
    Azañón E; Camacho K; Soto-Faraco S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2010 May; 31(10):1858-67. PubMed ID: 20584190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Flexibly weighted integration of tactile reference frames.
    Badde S; Röder B; Heed T
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Apr; 70():367-74. PubMed ID: 25447059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the influence of schematic drawings of body parts on tactile discrimination performance using the crossmodal congruency task.
    Igarashi Y; Kitagawa N; Spence C; Ichihara S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Feb; 124(2):190-208. PubMed ID: 16759624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatiotemporal interactions between audition and touch depend on hand posture.
    Sanabria D; Soto-Faraco S; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 165(4):505-14. PubMed ID: 15942735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Event-related potential evidence for a dynamic (re-)weighting of somatotopic and external coordinates of touch during visual-tactile interactions.
    Ley P; Steinberg U; Hanganu-Opatz IL; Röder B
    Eur J Neurosci; 2015 May; 41(11):1466-74. PubMed ID: 25879770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vision and touch in ageing: crossmodal selective attention and visuotactile spatial interactions.
    Poliakoff E; Ashworth S; Lowe C; Spence C
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(4):507-17. PubMed ID: 16098997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Response requirements modulate tactile spatial congruency effects.
    Gallace A; Soto-Faraco S; Dalton P; Kreukniet B; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 191(2):171-86. PubMed ID: 18709500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of the body on crossmodal interference effects between tactile and two-dimensional visual stimuli.
    Igarashi Y; Kitagawa N; Ichihara S
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Jul; 204(3):419-30. PubMed ID: 20577727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Temporal aspects of the visuotactile congruency effect.
    Shore DI; Barnes ME; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Jan; 392(1-2):96-100. PubMed ID: 16213655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of gaze direction on crossmodal modulation of visual ERPS by endogenous tactile spatial attention.
    Macaluso E; Driver J; van Velzen J; Eimer M
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 May; 23(2-3):406-17. PubMed ID: 15820647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrophysiological correlates of crossmodal visual distractor congruency effects: evidence for response conflict.
    Forster B; Pavone EF
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2008 Mar; 8(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 18405047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial tuning of tactile attention modulates visual processing within hemifields: an ERP investigation of crossmodal attention.
    Eimer M; van Velzen J
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 166(3-4):402-10. PubMed ID: 16034566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A three-dimensional spatial characterization of the crossed-hands deficit.
    Azañón E; Mihaljevic K; Longo MR
    Cognition; 2016 Dec; 157():289-295. PubMed ID: 27697737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.