These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16483617)
1. An olfactory biconditional discrimination in the mouse. Dreumont-Boudreau SE; Dingle RN; Alcolado GM; LoLordo VM Physiol Behav; 2006 Mar; 87(3):634-40. PubMed ID: 16483617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Elemental and non-elemental olfactory learning in Drosophila. Young JM; Wessnitzer J; Armstrong JD; Webb B Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2011 Sep; 96(2):339-52. PubMed ID: 21742045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of food restriction on acquisition and expression of a conditioned odor discrimination in mice. Forestell CA; Schellinck HM; Boudreau SE; LoLordo VM Physiol Behav; 2001 Mar; 72(4):559-66. PubMed ID: 11282140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Odor-cued taste avoidance: a simple and robust test of mouse olfaction. Slotnick B; Coppola DM Chem Senses; 2015 May; 40(4):269-78. PubMed ID: 25787943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of similarity between elemental stimuli and compounds in olfactory patterning discriminations. Deisig N; Lachnit H; Giurfa M Learn Mem; 2002; 9(3):112-21. PubMed ID: 12074999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Olfactory discrimination ability of CD-1 mice for a large array of enantiomers. Laska M; Shepherd GM Neuroscience; 2007 Jan; 144(1):295-301. PubMed ID: 17045753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the ability of mice to detect VOCs, using a positive operant reinforcement procedure. Hojo R J Toxicol Sci; 2015 Aug; 40(4):479-83. PubMed ID: 26165644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Configural olfactory learning in honeybees: negative and positive patterning discrimination. Deisig N; Lachnit H; Giurfa M; Hellstern F Learn Mem; 2001; 8(2):70-8. PubMed ID: 11274252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A modified version of the unique cue theory accounts for olfactory compound processing in honeybees. Deisig N; Lachnit H; Sandoz JC; Lober K; Giurfa M Learn Mem; 2003; 10(3):199-208. PubMed ID: 12773584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. When patterning discriminations are harder than biconditional ones: A cue constellation approach. Whitlow JW; Loatman PA J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Oct; 41(4):354-70. PubMed ID: 26147603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Testing for odor discrimination and habituation in mice. Arbuckle EP; Smith GD; Gomez MC; Lugo JN J Vis Exp; 2015 May; (99):e52615. PubMed ID: 25992586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of dietary and genetic cues on the ability of rats to discriminate between the urinary odors of MHC-congenic mice. Brown RE; Schellinck HM; West AM Physiol Behav; 1996 Aug; 60(2):365-72. PubMed ID: 8840893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Successful acquisition of an olfactory discrimination paradigm by South African fur seals, Arctocephalus pusillus. Laska M; Svelander M; Amundin M Physiol Behav; 2008 Mar; 93(4-5):1033-8. PubMed ID: 18291428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Elemental, configural, and occasion setting mechanisms in biconditional and patterning discriminations. Delamater AR; Garr E; Lawrence S; Whitlow JW Behav Processes; 2017 Apr; 137():40-52. PubMed ID: 27826037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Response accuracy and odor sampling time in mice trained to discriminate between enantiomers of carvone and those of terpinen-4-ol. Slotnick B Chem Senses; 2007 Sep; 32(7):721-5. PubMed ID: 17567630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Value transfer across odor stimuli using probability of reinforcement in the rat. Kaiser DH; Means L Behav Processes; 2006 Sep; 73(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 16781086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Configurational and nonconfigurational interactions between odorants in binary mixtures. Wiltrout C; Dogra S; Linster C Behav Neurosci; 2003 Apr; 117(2):236-45. PubMed ID: 12708520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Maintaining accuracy at the expense of speed: stimulus similarity defines odor discrimination time in mice. Abraham NM; Spors H; Carleton A; Margrie TW; Kuner T; Schaefer AT Neuron; 2004 Dec; 44(5):865-76. PubMed ID: 15572116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]