These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16484276)
1. Assessing fitness to practise: common sense approach to revalidation/accreditation. Joseph AE BMJ; 2006 Feb; 332(7538):424. PubMed ID: 16484276 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing fitness to practise: revalidation is a long and winding road. Conlon M BMJ; 2006 Feb; 332(7538):424-5. PubMed ID: 16484275 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Developing standards, criteria, and thresholds to assess fitness to practise. Baker R BMJ; 2006 Jan; 332(7535):230-2. PubMed ID: 16439405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Regulation and revalidation of doctors. Pringle M BMJ; 2006 Jul; 333(7560):161-2. PubMed ID: 16858022 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Regulation and revalidation of doctors: dangers and opportunities. Keighley BD BMJ; 2006 Aug; 333(7562):303. PubMed ID: 16888310 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Regulation and revalidation of doctors: summary of other responses. Twisselmann B BMJ; 2006 Aug; 333(7562):303-4. PubMed ID: 16888309 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Regulation and revalidation of doctors: response from the General Medical Council. Catto G BMJ; 2006 Aug; 333(7562):303. PubMed ID: 16888311 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Where next with revalidation? Political will does not exist for radical reform. Dudley N BMJ; 2005 Aug; 331(7512):353. PubMed ID: 16081463 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Revalidation: the purpose needs to be clear. van Zwanenberg T BMJ; 2004 Mar; 328(7441):684-6. PubMed ID: 15031240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hospitals as comprehensive evaluators of physicians' competence. Volpintesta EJ Conn Med; 2010; 74(6):355. PubMed ID: 20648845 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The road to revalidation. Griffiths J Midwives; 2016; 19():60-2. PubMed ID: 27498483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Revalidation in the UK. Kmietowicz Z BMJ; 2005 May; 330(7500):1145. PubMed ID: 15891234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The General Medical Council and the future of revalidation: regulation, regulation, regulation. O'Donnell M BMJ; 2005 Jun; 330(7505):1447. PubMed ID: 15961827 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. GMC's proposals for revalidation. Effective revalidation system looks at how doctors practise and quality of patients' experience. Jolly B; McAvoy P; Southgate L BMJ; 2001 Feb; 322(7282):358-9. PubMed ID: 11273234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Australia shows benefits of an independent tribunal. Arnold PC BMJ; 2007 Mar; 334(7593):549. PubMed ID: 17363787 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Revalidation for doctors in the United Kingdom: the end or the beginning? du Boulay C BMJ; 2000 Jun; 320(7248):1490. PubMed ID: 10834874 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Time for radical reform. Walshe K; Benson L BMJ; 2005 Jun; 330(7506):1504-6. PubMed ID: 15976427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Revalidation for relicensing - reflections on the proposed British model. Thistlethwaite J; Charlton R; Coomber J Aust Fam Physician; 2012; 41(1-2):70-2. PubMed ID: 22276290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reactions to the chief medical officer's report: overegging the pudding. Goodman NW BMJ; 2006 Nov; 333(7577):1071-2. PubMed ID: 17110728 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]