These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16485364)

  • 21. Biotechnology inventions in the health care environment: what to patent and how to avoid defeat.
    Murashige KR
    Benders Health Care Law Mon; 1995 Dec; ():3-10. PubMed ID: 10158648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Who deserves the patent pot of gold?: an inquiry into the proper inventorship of patient-based discoveries.
    Ho CM
    DePaul J Health Care Law; 2004; 7(2):185-243. PubMed ID: 15675072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A modest proposal: toward improved access to biotechnology research tools by implementing a broad experimental use exception.
    Hoffman DC
    Cornell Law Rev; 2004 May; 89(4):993-1043. PubMed ID: 15174465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Patents, patients, and public policy: an incomplete intersection at 35 U.S.C. Section 287(c).
    Ho CM
    Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 2000; 33(3):601-75. PubMed ID: 16389678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Europe's patent rebellion.
    Wadman M
    Fortune; 2001 Oct; 144(6):44. PubMed ID: 11586878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. OTA panel opens inquiry into patenting of genes.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 1993 Apr; 362(6419):386. PubMed ID: 8464461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Recent US patent legislation: what's new for biotech?
    Gogoris AC; Todaro JC
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Feb; 18(2):229-31. PubMed ID: 10657135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Three legal frameworks for regulating genetic technology.
    Huhn W
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2002; 19(1):1-36. PubMed ID: 12733222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The new section 103(b) of the patent law: an obvious solution?
    Van Horn CE; Barlow SA
    Nat Biotechnol; 1996 Jun; 14(6):773-4. PubMed ID: 9630989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. NIH cDNA patent rejected; backers want to amend law.
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1992 Sep; 359(6393):263. PubMed ID: 1406922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Patent border wars: defining the boundary between scientific discoveries and patentable inventions.
    Holman CM
    Trends Biotechnol; 2007 Dec; 25(12):539-43. PubMed ID: 17983675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. PMA primacy: synthesizing the 35 U.S.C. Section 156 patent term extension, 35 U.S.C. Section 271(e)(1) patent infringement exemption as currently applied to medical devices, and medical device preemption jurisprudence to yield a cohesive solution regarding scope of coverage.
    Flaherty JM
    Food Drug Law J; 2001; 56(3):339-49. PubMed ID: 11944643
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Intellectual property rights in genes and gene fragments: a registration solution for expressed sequence tags.
    Holman MA; Munzer SR
    Iowa Law Rev; 2000 Mar; 85(3):735-848. PubMed ID: 16523593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Proposed changes to patent code loom over biotech industry.
    Coombs A
    Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Dec; 25(12):1333-4. PubMed ID: 18066010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Major patent reform moves closer.
    Hughes B
    Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2007 Sep; 6(9):688-9. PubMed ID: 17907341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Opinions evolve on Kauffman patent.
    Dove A
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Apr; 18(4):373. PubMed ID: 10748506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. New rules for gene patents.
    Grisham J
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Sep; 18(9):921. PubMed ID: 10973202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Gene patents and the death of dualism.
    Goldberg S
    South Calif Interdiscip Law J; 1996; 5(1):25-40. PubMed ID: 16211765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Data disclosure crucial after DNA patent verdict.
    de Costa A
    Science; 2013 Aug; 341(6149):959. PubMed ID: 23990544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Bayh-Dole: if we knew then what we know now.
    Boettiger S; Bennett AB
    Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Mar; 24(3):320-3. PubMed ID: 16525405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.