These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16486058)

  • 1. Hydrodynamic resistance of close-approached slip surfaces with a nanoasperity or an entrapped nanobubble.
    Fan TH; Vinogradova OI
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2005 Dec; 72(6 Pt 2):066306. PubMed ID: 16486058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surface roughness and hydrodynamic boundary conditions.
    Vinogradova OI; Yakubov GE
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2006 Apr; 73(4 Pt 2):045302. PubMed ID: 16711868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement of no-slip and slip boundary conditions in confined Newtonian fluids using atomic force microscopy.
    Henry CL; Craig VS
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2009 Nov; 11(41):9514-21. PubMed ID: 19830336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Boundary lubrication of heterogeneous surfaces and the onset of cavitation in frictional contacts.
    Savio D; Pastewka L; Gumbsch P
    Sci Adv; 2016 Mar; 2(3):e1501585. PubMed ID: 27051871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence of the no-slip boundary condition of water flow between hydrophilic surfaces using atomic force microscopy.
    Maali A; Wang Y; Bhushan B
    Langmuir; 2009 Oct; 25(20):12002-5. PubMed ID: 19821617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surface roughness and hydrodynamic boundary slip of a newtonian fluid in a completely wetting system.
    Bonaccurso E; Butt HJ; Craig VS
    Phys Rev Lett; 2003 Apr; 90(14):144501. PubMed ID: 12731919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Random-roughness hydrodynamic boundary conditions.
    Kunert C; Harting J; Vinogradova OI
    Phys Rev Lett; 2010 Jul; 105(1):016001. PubMed ID: 20867466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Viscosity effects on hydrodynamic drainage force measurements involving deformable bodies.
    Dagastine RR; Webber GB; Manica R; Stevens GW; Grieser F; Chan DY
    Langmuir; 2010 Jul; 26(14):11921-7. PubMed ID: 20578751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Probing Boundary Conditions at Hydrophobic Solid-Water Interfaces by Dynamic Film Drainage Measurement.
    Zhang X; Manica R; Tang Y; Tchoukov P; Liu Q; Xu Z
    Langmuir; 2018 Oct; 34(40):12025-12035. PubMed ID: 30173510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surface roughness and effective stick-slip motion.
    Ponomarev IV; Meyerovich AE
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2003 Feb; 67(2 Pt 2):026302. PubMed ID: 12636795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Boundary Condition in Liquid Thin Films Revealed through the Thermal Fluctuations of Their Free Surfaces.
    Pottier B; Frétigny C; Talini L
    Phys Rev Lett; 2015 Jun; 114(22):227801. PubMed ID: 26196646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Functional levels of floor surface roughness for the prevention of slips and falls: clean-and-dry and soapsuds-covered wet surfaces.
    Kim IJ; Hsiao H; Simeonov P
    Appl Ergon; 2013 Jan; 44(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 22641153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Drag force on a sphere moving toward an anisotropic superhydrophobic plane.
    Asmolov ES; Belyaev AV; Vinogradova OI
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2011 Aug; 84(2 Pt 2):026330. PubMed ID: 21929113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Boundary slip on smooth hydrophobic surfaces: intrinsic effects and possible artifacts.
    Cottin-Bizonne C; Cross B; Steinberger A; Charlaix E
    Phys Rev Lett; 2005 Feb; 94(5):056102. PubMed ID: 15783663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scaling Hydrodynamic Boundary Conditions of Microstructured Surfaces in the Thin Channel Limit.
    Pilkington GA; Gupta R; Fréchette J
    Langmuir; 2016 Mar; 32(10):2360-8. PubMed ID: 26901492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Limits of the hydrodynamic no-slip boundary condition.
    Zhu Y; Granick S
    Phys Rev Lett; 2002 Mar; 88(10):106102. PubMed ID: 11909376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of pH on Effective Slip Length and Surface Charge at Solid-Oil Interfaces of Roughness-Induced Surfaces.
    Tian P; Li Y
    Micromachines (Basel); 2021 Jun; 12(7):. PubMed ID: 34206835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Boundary slip study on hydrophilic, hydrophobic, and superhydrophobic surfaces with dynamic atomic force microscopy.
    Bhushan B; Wang Y; Maali A
    Langmuir; 2009 Jul; 25(14):8117-21. PubMed ID: 19402684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling the combined effect of surface roughness and shear rate on slip flow of simple fluids.
    Niavarani A; Priezjev NV
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2010 Jan; 81(1 Pt 1):011606. PubMed ID: 20365383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Slip-length measurement of confined air flow using dynamic atomic force microscopy.
    Maali A; Bhushan B
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2008 Aug; 78(2 Pt 2):027302. PubMed ID: 18850978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.