216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16487160)
1. Face and gaze processing in normally developing children: a magnetoencephalographic study.
Kylliäinen A; Braeutigam S; Hietanen JK; Swithenby SJ; Bailey AJ
Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Feb; 23(3):801-10. PubMed ID: 16487160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Face- and gaze-sensitive neural responses in children with autism: a magnetoencephalographic study.
Kylliäinen A; Braeutigam S; Hietanen JK; Swithenby SJ; Bailey AJ
Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Nov; 24(9):2679-90. PubMed ID: 17100856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Abnormal activation of face processing systems at early and intermediate latency in individuals with autism spectrum disorder: a magnetoencephalographic study.
Bailey AJ; Braeutigam S; Jousmäki V; Swithenby SJ
Eur J Neurosci; 2005 May; 21(9):2575-85. PubMed ID: 15932615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dynamic brain activation patterns for face recognition: a magnetoencephalography study.
Lee D; Simos P; Sawrie SM; Martin RC; Knowlton RC
Brain Topogr; 2005; 18(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 16193263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Brain responses to repetitions of human and animal faces, inverted faces, and objects: an MEG study.
Schweinberger SR; Kaufmann JM; Moratti S; Keil A; Burton AM
Brain Res; 2007 Dec; 1184():226-33. PubMed ID: 17976538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of personal familiarity on early neuromagnetic correlates of face perception.
Kloth N; Dobel C; Schweinberger SR; Zwitserlood P; Bölte J; Junghöfer M
Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Dec; 24(11):3317-21. PubMed ID: 17156392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Endogenous context for visual processing of human faces and other objects.
Braeutigam S; Swithenby SJ
Neuroreport; 2003 Jul; 14(10):1385-9. PubMed ID: 12876479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Explicit versus implicit gaze processing assessed by ERPs.
Itier RJ; Alain C; Kovacevic N; McIntosh AR
Brain Res; 2007 Oct; 1177():79-89. PubMed ID: 17916340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Face inversion disrupts the perception of vertical relations between features in the right human occipito-temporal cortex.
Goffaux V; Rossion B; Sorger B; Schiltz C; Goebel R
J Neuropsychol; 2009 Mar; 3(Pt 1):45-67. PubMed ID: 19338716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Face repetition effects in direct and indirect tasks: an event-related brain potentials study.
Trenner MU; Schweinberger SR; Jentzsch I; Sommer W
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Nov; 21(3):388-400. PubMed ID: 15511654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Children are sensitive to averted eyes at the earliest stage of gaze processing.
Kimura I; Kubota M; Hirose H; Yumoto M; Sakakihara Y
Neuroreport; 2004 Jun; 15(8):1345-8. PubMed ID: 15167563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Emotion processing in the visual brain: a MEG analysis.
Peyk P; Schupp HT; Elbert T; Junghöfer M
Brain Topogr; 2008 Jun; 20(4):205-15. PubMed ID: 18340522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dissociable roles of the human somatosensory and superior temporal cortices for processing social face signals.
Pourtois G; Sander D; Andres M; Grandjean D; Reveret L; Olivier E; Vuilleumier P
Eur J Neurosci; 2004 Dec; 20(12):3507-15. PubMed ID: 15610183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of face spatial frequencies on cortical processing revealed by magnetoencephalography.
Hsiao FJ; Hsieh JC; Lin YY; Chang Y
Neurosci Lett; 2005 May 20-27; 380(1-2):54-9. PubMed ID: 15854750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electrophysiological correlates of facial decision: insights from upright and upside-down Mooney-face perception.
George N; Jemel B; Fiori N; Chaby L; Renault B
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):663-73. PubMed ID: 15890502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inversion and contrast-reversal effects on face processing assessed by MEG.
Itier RJ; Herdman AT; George N; Cheyne D; Taylor MJ
Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1115(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 16930564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Human MT/V5 activity on viewing eye gaze changes in others: A magnetoencephalographic study.
Watanabe S; Kakigi R; Miki K; Puce A
Brain Res; 2006 May; 1092(1):152-60. PubMed ID: 16684514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spatiotemporal dynamics and connectivity pattern differences between centrally and peripherally presented faces.
Liu L; Ioannides AA
Neuroimage; 2006 Jul; 31(4):1726-40. PubMed ID: 16564185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Masked and unmasked electrophysiological repetition effects of famous faces.
Martens U; Schweinberger SR; Kiefer M; Burton AM
Brain Res; 2006 Sep; 1109(1):146-57. PubMed ID: 16872582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Neural correlates of processing facial identity based on features versus their spacing.
Maurer D; O'Craven KM; Le Grand R; Mondloch CJ; Springer MV; Lewis TL; Grady CL
Neuropsychologia; 2007 Apr; 45(7):1438-51. PubMed ID: 17204295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
