213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1648756)
1. Breast specimen microcalcifications: radiographic validation and pathologic-radiologic correlation.
D'Orsi CJ; Reale FR; Davis MA; Brown VJ
Radiology; 1991 Aug; 180(2):397-401. PubMed ID: 1648756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Radiologic-histopathologic correlation of microcalcifications from 11g vacuum biopsy: analysis of 3196 core biopsies].
Fischmann A; Pietsch-Breitfeld B; Müller-Schimpfle M; Siegmann K; Wersebe A; Rothenberger-Janzen K; Claussen CD; Janzen J
Rofo; 2004 Apr; 176(4):538-43. PubMed ID: 15088178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: correlation between mammographic calcification and tumor subtype.
Stomper PC; Connolly JL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Sep; 159(3):483-5. PubMed ID: 1323923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microcalcifications associated with ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic-pathologic correlation.
Holland R; Hendriks JH
Semin Diagn Pathol; 1994 Aug; 11(3):181-92. PubMed ID: 7831529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. X-raying of sliced surgical specimens during surgery: an improvement of the histological diagnosis of impalpable breast lesions with microcalfications.
Charpin C; Bonnier P; Habib MC; Andrac L; Vacheret H; Lavaut MN; Ansaldi JL; Allasia C; Piana L
Anticancer Res; 1992; 12(5):1737-46. PubMed ID: 1332583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinically occult ductal carcinoma in situ detected with mammography: analysis of 100 cases with radiologic-pathologic correlation.
Stomper PC; Connolly JL; Meyer JE; Harris JR
Radiology; 1989 Jul; 172(1):235-41. PubMed ID: 2544922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Radiographic image magnification as quality control of microcalcification imaging within the scope of histopathological control of breast biopsy tissue].
Grunert JH; Flemming P; Borchert B; Farber A; Gmelin E
Rofo; 2000 Jan; 172(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 10719466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digitization of microcalcifications in breast radiographs. Correlation with pathologic data.
Charpin C; Allasia C; Davies JD; Devictor B; Boulat J; Ansaldi JL; Lavaut MN; Serradour B; Andrac L; Piana L
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1995 Aug; 17(4):230-40. PubMed ID: 8526947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biopsy for microcalcification detected by mammography.
Roses DF; Harris MN; Gorstein F; Gumport SL
Surgery; 1980 Mar; 87(3):248-52. PubMed ID: 6244682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microtome shaving radiography: demonstration of loss of mammographic microcalcifications during histologic sectioning.
Winston JS; Geradts J; Liu DF; Stomper PC
Breast J; 2004; 10(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 15125745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The significance of mammographic calcifications in early breast cancer detection.
Rosselli Del Turco M; Ciatto S; Bravetti P; Pacini P
Radiol Med; 1986; 72(1-2):7-12. PubMed ID: 3008222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Correlation of numerically detected microcalcifications on the mammogram and in this manner diagnosed carcinomas and mastopathies].
Menges V; Wellauer J; Engeler V; Stadelmann R
Radiologe; 1973 Nov; 13(11):468-76. PubMed ID: 4360451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Paraffin tissue block radiography: adjunct to breast specimen radiography.
Rebner M; Helvie MA; Pennes DR; Oberman HA; Ikeda DM; Adler DD
Radiology; 1989 Dec; 173(3):695-6. PubMed ID: 2682773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Detection of microcalcifications in breast specimens by 4-fold DIMA direct magnification radiography compared to 1.5-fold conventional magnification radiography].
Grunert JH; Borchert B; Farber A; Gmelin E
Rofo; 1999 Oct; 171(4):302-6. PubMed ID: 10598166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Carcinoma within fibroadenomas: mammographic features.
Baker KS; Monsees BS; Diaz NM; Destouet JM; McDivitt RW
Radiology; 1990 Aug; 176(2):371-4. PubMed ID: 2164233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Microcalcifications associated with in situ ductal breast carcinoma. Mammographic and histological correlations with morphometric evaluation].
Negri S; Capitanio A; Pegorari E; Azzolini D; Sardo P
Pathologica; 1999 Jun; 91(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 10536463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Focal areas of increased opacity in ductal carcinoma in situ of the comedo type: mammographic-pathologic correlation.
Kinkel K; Gilles R; Féger C; Guinebretière JM; Tardivon AA; Masselot J; Vanel D
Radiology; 1994 Aug; 192(2):443-6. PubMed ID: 8029412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Diagnostic significance of calcifications in the mammogram].
Menges V
Z Lymphol; 1981 Jul; 5(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 6270925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Morphometry by analysis of microcalcifications and histopathological diagnosis: a new approach to the diagnosis of impalpable lesions of the breast detected by mammography].
Charpin C; Garcia S
Bull Acad Natl Med; 1995 Oct; 179(7):1517-31; discussion 1532-7. PubMed ID: 8556425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tubular carcinoma of the breast. Mammographic appearance and pathological correlation.
Feig SA; Shaber GS; Patchefsky AS; Schwartz GF; Edeiken J; Nerlinger R
Radiology; 1978 Nov; 129(2):311-4. PubMed ID: 212776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
