474 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16487809)
1. A biomechanical comparison of 2 techniques for reconstructing atrophic edentulous mandible fractures.
Madsen MJ; Haug RH
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Mar; 64(3):457-65. PubMed ID: 16487809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A biomechanical evaluation of bilateral sagittal ramus osteotomy fixation techniques.
Peterson GP; Haug RH; Van Sickels J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Sep; 63(9):1317-24. PubMed ID: 16122596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A biomechanical evaluation of mandibular angle fracture plating techniques.
Haug RH; Fattahi TT; Goltz M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Oct; 59(10):1199-210. PubMed ID: 11573182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative biomechanical evaluation of mandibular condyle fracture plating techniques.
Asprino L; Consani S; de Moraes M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Mar; 64(3):452-6. PubMed ID: 16487808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An in vitro comparison of an adjustable bone fixation system.
Van Sickels JE; Peterson GP; Holms S; Haug RH
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Nov; 63(11):1620-5. PubMed ID: 16243179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A biomechanical evaluation of plating techniques used for reconstructing mandibular symphysis/parasymphysis fractures.
Madsen MJ; McDaniel CA; Haug RH
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 66(10):2012-9. PubMed ID: 18848096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does plate adaptation affect stability? A biomechanical comparison of locking and nonlocking plates.
Haug RH; Street CC; Goltz M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Nov; 60(11):1319-26. PubMed ID: 12420268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A biomechanical evaluation of mandibular condyle fracture plating techniques.
Haug RH; Peterson GP; Goltz M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Jan; 60(1):73-80; discussion 80-1. PubMed ID: 11757012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An in vitro study of the effect of bony buttressing on fixation strength of a fractured atrophic edentulous mandible model.
Sikes JW; Smith BR; Mukherjee DP
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Jan; 58(1):56-61; discussion 62. PubMed ID: 10632166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: advancement surgery.
Brasileiro BF; Grempel RG; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):809-17. PubMed ID: 19304039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative study of the mechanical resistance of 2 separate plates and 2 overlaid plates used in the fixation of the mandibular condyle: an in vitro study.
Gealh WC; Costa JV; Ferreira GM; Iwaki Filho L
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):738-43. PubMed ID: 19304028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An in vitro evaluation of miniplate fixation techniques for fractures of the atrophic edentulous mandible.
Choi BH; Huh JY; Suh CH; Kim KN
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 34(2):174-7. PubMed ID: 15695047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: setback surgery.
Brasileiro BF; Grotta-Grempel R; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):941-51. PubMed ID: 21752510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical analysis of miniplate osteosynthesis for fractures of the atrophic mandible.
Sugiura T; Yamamoto K; Murakami K; Kawakami M; Kang YB; Tsutsumi S; Kirita T
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Nov; 67(11):2397-403. PubMed ID: 19837308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical evaluation of Le Fort I maxillary fracture plating techniques.
Wang H; Chen MS; Fan YB; Tang W; Tian WD
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jun; 65(6):1109-16. PubMed ID: 17517293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison between locking and non-locking plates for fixation of metacarpal fractures in an animal model.
Ochman S; Doht S; Paletta J; Langer M; Raschke MJ; Meffert RH
J Hand Surg Am; 2010 Apr; 35(4):597-603. PubMed ID: 20299161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical comparison of plating techniques for fractures of the mandibular condyle.
Alkan A; Metin M; Muğlali M; Ozden B; Celebi N
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 45(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 16777278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical comparison of double-row locking plates versus single- and double-row non-locking plates in a comminuted metacarpal fracture model.
Gajendran VK; Szabo RM; Myo GK; Curtiss SB
J Hand Surg Am; 2009 Dec; 34(10):1851-8. PubMed ID: 19897325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A 3-dimensional finite-element analysis investigating the biomechanical behavior of the mandible and plate osteosynthesis in cases of fractures of the condylar process.
Wagner A; Krach W; Schicho K; Undt G; Ploder O; Ewers R
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Dec; 94(6):678-86. PubMed ID: 12464890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Strength analysis of Le Fort I osteotomy fixation: titanium versus resorbable plates.
Araujo MM; Waite PD; Lemons JE
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Sep; 59(9):1034-9; discussion 1039-40. PubMed ID: 11526573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
