210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16488227)
1. Design factors influencing performance of constrained acetabular liners: finite element characterization.
Bouchard SM; Stewart KJ; Pedersen DR; Callaghan JJ; Brown TD
J Biomech; 2006; 39(5):885-93. PubMed ID: 16488227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Geometric element analysis of fretting in a model of a modular femoral component of a hip implant.
Lewis G
Biomed Mater Eng; 2004; 14(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 14757952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Finite element simulation of early creep and wear in total hip arthroplasty.
Bevill SL; Bevill GR; Penmetsa JR; Petrella AJ; Rullkoetter PJ
J Biomech; 2005 Dec; 38(12):2365-74. PubMed ID: 16214484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of femoral head size on impingement, dislocation and stress distribution in total hip replacement.
Kluess D; Martin H; Mittelmeier W; Schmitz KP; Bader R
Med Eng Phys; 2007 May; 29(4):465-71. PubMed ID: 16901743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Loss in mechanical contact of cementless acetabular prostheses due to post-operative weight bearing: a biomechanical model.
Bellini CM; Galbusera F; Ceroni RG; Raimondi MT
Med Eng Phys; 2007 Mar; 29(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 16569508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [FE-analysis of surface stresses for the tribological system in total hip prostheses].
Behrens BA; Helms G; Pösse O; Nolte I; Meyer-Lindenberg A; Rittmann P; Windhagen H; Pressel T
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2006 Dec; 51(5-6):367-70. PubMed ID: 17155874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Problematic sites of third body embedment in polyethylene for total hip wear acceleration.
Lundberg HJ; Stewart KJ; Pedersen DR; Callaghan JJ; Brown TD
J Biomech; 2006; 39(7):1208-16. PubMed ID: 15894322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Experimental analysis of neutral, asymmetric and constraint liners for total hip replacement: investigation of range of motion and protection against joint instability].
Bader R; Steinhauser E; Scholz R; Simnacher M; Mittelmeier W
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2004; 142(5):577-85. PubMed ID: 15472768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Finite element analysis of a three-dimensional model of a proximal femur-cemented femoral THJR component construct: influence of assigned interface conditions on strain energy density.
Lewis G; Duggineni R
Biomed Mater Eng; 2006; 16(5):319-27. PubMed ID: 17075167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Association between dislocation, impingement, and articular geometry in retrieved acetabular polyethylene cups.
Tanino H; Harman MK; Banks SA; Hodge WA
J Orthop Res; 2007 Nov; 25(11):1401-7. PubMed ID: 17471491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 3D non-linear analysis of the acetabular construct following impaction grafting.
Phillips AT; Pankaj P; Howie CR; Usmani AS; Simpson AH
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2006 Jun; 9(3):125-33. PubMed ID: 16880163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Constrained acetabular liners: mechanisms of failure.
Yun AG; Padgett D; Pellicci P; Dorr LD
J Arthroplasty; 2005 Jun; 20(4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16124973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of head diameter and wall thickness on deformations of metallic acetabular press-fit cups and UHMWPE liners: a finite element analysis.
Goebel P; Kluess D; Wieding J; Souffrant R; Heyer H; Sander M; Bader R
J Orthop Sci; 2013 Mar; 18(2):264-70. PubMed ID: 23377753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Pressfit of equatorially roughened cementless acetabular components--a finite element analysis].
von Knoch M; Pandorf T; Büscher R; Piotrowski A; von Knoch F; Patsalis T; Wedemeyer C; Marx A; Fischer A; Löer F; Saxler G
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2006 Apr; 51(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 16771126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Shell retention with a cemented acetabular liner.
Callaghan JJ; Liu SS; Schularick NM
Orthopedics; 2009 Sep; 32(9):. PubMed ID: 19751011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Acetabular cup geometry and bone-implant interference have more influence on initial periprosthetic joint space than joint loading and surgical cup insertion.
Ong KL; Lehman J; Notz WI; Santner TJ; Bartel DL
J Biomech Eng; 2006 Apr; 128(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 16524327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evaluation of the assembling and retention forces of constraint liners for total hip replacement].
Steinhauser E; Bader R; Simnacher M; Scholz R; Gradinger R
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2005 Oct; 50(10):314-9. PubMed ID: 16300046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of contact mechanics in McKee-farrar metal-on-metal hip implants.
Yew A; Jagatia M; Ensaff H; Jin ZM
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2003; 217(5):333-40. PubMed ID: 14558645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Finite element analysis of shear stresses at the implant-bone interface of an acetabular press-fit cup during impingement.
Voigt C; Klöhn C; Bader R; von Salis-Soglio G; Scholz R
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2007 Apr; 52(2):208-15. PubMed ID: 17408381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of acetabular cup size on the short-term stability of revision hip arthroplasty: a finite element investigation.
Phillips AT; Pankaj ; Usmani AS; Howie CR
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2004; 218(4):239-49. PubMed ID: 15376726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
