333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16489193)
1. Image quality and breast dose of 24 screen-film combinations for mammography.
Dimakopoulou AD; Tsalafoutas IA; Georgiou EK; Yakoumakis EN
Br J Radiol; 2006 Feb; 79(938):123-9. PubMed ID: 16489193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of a new mammographic film: methods and considerations.
Tsalafoutas OA; Kolovos CA; Tsapaki V; Betsou S; Koliakou E; Maniatis PN; Xenofos S
Health Phys; 2008 Apr; 94(4):338-44. PubMed ID: 18332725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimizing optical density of a Kodak mammography film-screen combination with standard-cycle processing.
McParland BJ; Boyd MM; al Yousef K
Br J Radiol; 1998 Sep; 71(849):950-3. PubMed ID: 10195010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Variation of the sensitometric characteristics of seven mammographic films with processing conditions.
Tsalafoutas IA; Dimakopoulou AD; Koulentianos ED; Serefoglou AN; Yakoumakis EN
Br J Radiol; 2004 Aug; 77(920):666-71. PubMed ID: 15326045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. New mammography screen/film combinations: imaging characteristics and radiation dose.
Kimme-Smith C; Bassett LW; Gold RH; Zheutlin J; Gornbein JA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Apr; 154(4):713-9. PubMed ID: 2107663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sensitometric properties of Agfa Dentus OrthoLux, Agfa Dentus ST8G, and Kodak Ektavision panoramic radiographic film.
Wakoh M; Nishikawa K; Kobayashi N; Farman AG; Kuroyanagi K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Feb; 91(2):244-51. PubMed ID: 11174605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance tests for mammographic film-screen combinations: use of absolute techniques.
Bor D; Akdur K
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2013; 19(5):360-70. PubMed ID: 23603122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Short communication: a comparison of fine and medium screens for mammography.
Burch A; Law J
Br J Radiol; 1996 Feb; 69(818):182-5. PubMed ID: 8785649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of radiographic image quality parameters obtained with the REX simulator.
Magalhaes LA; Drexler GG; deAlmeida CE
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(4):614-8. PubMed ID: 21273198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implications of using high contrast mammography X-ray film-screen combinations.
Meeson S; Young KC; Rust A; Wallis MG; Cooke J; Ramsdale ML
Br J Radiol; 2001 Sep; 74(885):825-35. PubMed ID: 11560831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative study of films and screens for mammography.
Kirkpatrick AE; Law J
Br J Radiol; 1987 Jan; 60(709):73-8. PubMed ID: 3814998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Films, screens and cassettes for mammography.
Law J; Kirkpatrick AE
Br J Radiol; 1989 Feb; 62(734):163-7. PubMed ID: 2924096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiographic mottle and patient exposure in mammography.
Barnes GT; Chakraborty DP
Radiology; 1982 Dec; 145(3):815-21. PubMed ID: 7146416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of processing conditions on mammographic image quality.
Braeuning MP; Cooper HW; O'Brien S; Burns CB; Washburn DB; Schell MJ; Pisano ED
Acad Radiol; 1999 Aug; 6(8):464-70. PubMed ID: 10480042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characterization of the reciprocity law failure in three mammography screen-film systems.
de Almeida A; Sobol WT; Barnes GT
Med Phys; 1999 May; 26(5):682-8. PubMed ID: 10360527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of two mammography film-screen combinations designed for standard-cycle processing.
McParland BJ
Br J Radiol; 1999 Jan; 72(853):73-5. PubMed ID: 10341692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of mammography screen-film combinations.
Schueler BA; Gray JE; Gisvold JJ
Radiology; 1992 Sep; 184(3):629-34. PubMed ID: 1509043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic quality of mammograms obtained with a new low-radiation-dose dual-screen and dual-emulsion film combination.
Wojtasek DA; Teixidor HS; Govoni AF; Gareen IF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Feb; 154(2):265-70. PubMed ID: 2105011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of image quality on 28 mammography X-ray sets in the UK.
Law J
Br J Radiol; 1997 Nov; 70(839):1131-8. PubMed ID: 9536904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The technical support of mammography].
Rozhkova NI; Chikirdin EG; Riudiger IuG; Kochetova GP; Lisachenko IV; Iakobs OE
Med Tekh; 2000; (5):45-7. PubMed ID: 11076366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
