These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16489721)

  • 1. Constitutional law--abortion rights--fourth circuit declares Virginia partial birth infanticide statute unconstitutional per se.--Richmond Medical Center for Women v. Hicks, 409 F.3d 619 (4th Cir.), reh'g and reh'g en banc denied, 422 F.3d 160 (4th Cir. 2005).
    Harv Law Rev; 2005 Dec; 119(2):685-92. PubMed ID: 16489721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Employment law--Title VII--Eighth Circuit holds that benefits plans excluding all contraceptives do not discriminate based on sex.--In re Union Pacific Railroad Employment Practices Litigation, 479 F.3d 936 (8th Cir. 2007), reh'g and reh'g en banc denied, No. 06-1706 (8th Cir. May 23, 2007).
    Harv Law Rev; 2008 Mar; 121(5):1447-54. PubMed ID: 18441613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The supreme court and the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care.
    Blumenthal PD; Winikoff B
    MedGenMed; 2007 Jun; 9(2):52. PubMed ID: 17955106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How important was the Pill to women's economic well-being? If Roe v. Wade were overturned, how might society change?
    Joyce T
    J Policy Anal Manage; 2013; 32(4):879-87. PubMed ID: 24665470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Banning partial-birth abortion: drafting a constitutionally acceptable statute.
    Gough AD
    Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1998; 24(1):187-214. PubMed ID: 12774818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. It's my body, it's my choice: the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003.
    Kushnir TF
    Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 2004; 35(4):1117-88. PubMed ID: 15732189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The right's reasons: constitutional conflict and the spread of woman-protective antiabortion argument.
    Siegel RB
    Duke Law J; 2008 Apr; 57(6):1641-92. PubMed ID: 19108356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When pregnancy is an injury: rape, law, and culture.
    Bridges KM
    Stanford Law Rev; 2013 Mar; 65(3):457-516. PubMed ID: 23607144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stenberg v Carhart: a divided US Supreme Court debates partial birth abortion.
    Heffernan L
    Mod Law Rev; 2001 Jul; 64(4):618-27. PubMed ID: 16538739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Infanticide or civil rights for women: did the Supreme Court go too far in Stenberg v. Carhart?
    Schmutz SD
    Houst Law Rev; 2002; 39(2):529-66. PubMed ID: 15212035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Abortion and birth control--right to abortion and regulation thereof: the United States Supreme Court invalidates a statute banning partial birth abortions: Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914 (2000).
    Joersz M
    N D Law Rev; 2001; 77(2):345-73. PubMed ID: 12956123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Partial-birth abortion: should moral judgment prevail over medical judgment?
    Walther KE
    Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 2000; 31(4):693-736. PubMed ID: 11962531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reproductive self-determination in the Third Circuit: the statutory proscription of wrongful birth and wrongful life claims as an unconstitutional violation of Planned Parenthood v. Casey's undue burden standard.
    Intromasso C
    Womens Rights Law Report; 2003; 24(2):101-20. PubMed ID: 15568248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The right to privacy: Roe v. Wade revisited.
    Smith PA
    Jurist; 1983; 43(2):289-317. PubMed ID: 16086474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court.
    Bertz RC
    West State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is the right to health a necessary precondition for gender equality?
    Hammell H
    Rev Law Soc Change; 2011; 35(1):131-93. PubMed ID: 21936123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Women's Medical Professional Corporation v. Taft.
    United States. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
    Wests Fed Rep; 2003; 353():436-67. PubMed ID: 16477714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. If only policy analysis were so easy.
    Joyce T
    J Policy Anal Manage; 2013; 32(4):897-9. PubMed ID: 24665472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recent evidence on the broad benefits of reproductive health policy.
    Bailey MJ; Guldi M; Hershbein BJ
    J Policy Anal Manage; 2013; 32(4):888-96. PubMed ID: 24665471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The development of the undue burden standard in Stenberg v. Carhart: will proposed RU-486 legislation survive?
    Guenther H
    Indiana Law Rev; 2002; 35(3):1021-44. PubMed ID: 16211757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.