These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16489861)

  • 1. An advantage for detecting dynamic targets in natural scenes.
    Vuong QC; Hof AF; Bülthoff HH; Thornton IM
    J Vis; 2006 Jan; 6(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 16489861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A bottom-up model of spatial attention predicts human error patterns in rapid scene recognition.
    Einhäuser W; Mundhenk TN; Baldi P; Koch C; Itti L
    J Vis; 2007 Jul; 7(10):6.1-13. PubMed ID: 17997675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Motion-aftereffect-induced blindness.
    Lages M; Adams WJ; Graf EW
    J Vis; 2009 Oct; 9(11):11.1-7. PubMed ID: 20053074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distractor-induced blindness for orientation changes and coherent motion.
    Michael L; Hesselmann G; Kiefer M; Niedeggen M
    Vision Res; 2011 Aug; 51(15):1781-7. PubMed ID: 21703293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When is search for a static target among dynamic distractors efficient?
    Pinto Y; Olivers CN; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 16478326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conflicting motion information impairs multiple object tracking.
    St Clair R; Huff M; Seiffert AE
    J Vis; 2010 Apr; 10(4):18.1-13. PubMed ID: 20465337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Role of motion signals in recognizing subtle facial expressions of emotion.
    Bould E; Morris N
    Br J Psychol; 2008 May; 99(Pt 2):167-89. PubMed ID: 17535474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Continuous visual cues trigger automatic spatial target updating in dynamic scenes.
    Meyerhoff HS; Huff M; Papenmeier F; Jahn G; Schwan S
    Cognition; 2011 Oct; 121(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 21726856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How different types of scenes affect the Subjective Visual Vertical (SVV) and the Perceptual Upright (PU).
    Haji-Khamneh B; Harris LR
    Vision Res; 2010 Aug; 50(17):1720-7. PubMed ID: 20553740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Involuntary cueing effects on accuracy measures: Stimulus and task dependence.
    Kerzel D; Zarian L; Souto D
    J Vis; 2009 Oct; 9(11):16.1-16. PubMed ID: 20053079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Animal detection in natural scenes: critical features revisited.
    Wichmann FA; Drewes J; Rosas P; Gegenfurtner KR
    J Vis; 2010 Apr; 10(4):6.1-27. PubMed ID: 20465326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The neural basis of perceptual hypothesis generation and testing.
    Weidner R; Shah NJ; Fink GR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Feb; 18(2):258-66. PubMed ID: 16494685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatial attention, preview, and popout: which factors influence critical spacing in crowded displays?
    Scolari M; Kohnen A; Barton B; Awh E
    J Vis; 2007 Feb; 7(2):7.1-23. PubMed ID: 18217822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of target and distractor heterogeneity on search for a color target.
    Nagy AL; Neriani KE; Young TL
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(14):1885-99. PubMed ID: 15797778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The recognition of partially visible natural objects in the presence and absence of their occluders.
    Johnson JS; Olshausen BA
    Vision Res; 2005 Nov; 45(25-26):3262-76. PubMed ID: 16043208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Specifying the distractor inhibition account of attention-induced motion blindness.
    Hesselmann G; Niedeggen M; Sahraie A; Milders M
    Vision Res; 2006 Mar; 46(6-7):1048-56. PubMed ID: 16309728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. When are moving images remembered better? Study-test congruence and the dynamic superiority effect.
    Buratto LG; Matthews WJ; Lamberts K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Oct; 62(10):1896-903. PubMed ID: 19459084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptual completion in a dynamic scene: an investigation with an ambiguous motion paradigm.
    Remijn GB; Ito H
    Vision Res; 2007 Jun; 47(14):1869-79. PubMed ID: 17499332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contextual masking of oriented lines: interactions between surface segmentation cues.
    van der Smagt MJ; Wehrhahn C; Albright TD
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Jul; 94(1):576-89. PubMed ID: 15744014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recognizing people from dynamic and static faces and bodies: dissecting identity with a fusion approach.
    O'Toole AJ; Phillips PJ; Weimer S; Roark DA; Ayyad J; Barwick R; Dunlop J
    Vision Res; 2011 Jan; 51(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 20969886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.