These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
9. How different types of scenes affect the Subjective Visual Vertical (SVV) and the Perceptual Upright (PU). Haji-Khamneh B; Harris LR Vision Res; 2010 Aug; 50(17):1720-7. PubMed ID: 20553740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Involuntary cueing effects on accuracy measures: Stimulus and task dependence. Kerzel D; Zarian L; Souto D J Vis; 2009 Oct; 9(11):16.1-16. PubMed ID: 20053079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The neural basis of perceptual hypothesis generation and testing. Weidner R; Shah NJ; Fink GR J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Feb; 18(2):258-66. PubMed ID: 16494685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spatial attention, preview, and popout: which factors influence critical spacing in crowded displays? Scolari M; Kohnen A; Barton B; Awh E J Vis; 2007 Feb; 7(2):7.1-23. PubMed ID: 18217822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of target and distractor heterogeneity on search for a color target. Nagy AL; Neriani KE; Young TL Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(14):1885-99. PubMed ID: 15797778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The recognition of partially visible natural objects in the presence and absence of their occluders. Johnson JS; Olshausen BA Vision Res; 2005 Nov; 45(25-26):3262-76. PubMed ID: 16043208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Specifying the distractor inhibition account of attention-induced motion blindness. Hesselmann G; Niedeggen M; Sahraie A; Milders M Vision Res; 2006 Mar; 46(6-7):1048-56. PubMed ID: 16309728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. When are moving images remembered better? Study-test congruence and the dynamic superiority effect. Buratto LG; Matthews WJ; Lamberts K Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Oct; 62(10):1896-903. PubMed ID: 19459084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perceptual completion in a dynamic scene: an investigation with an ambiguous motion paradigm. Remijn GB; Ito H Vision Res; 2007 Jun; 47(14):1869-79. PubMed ID: 17499332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contextual masking of oriented lines: interactions between surface segmentation cues. van der Smagt MJ; Wehrhahn C; Albright TD J Neurophysiol; 2005 Jul; 94(1):576-89. PubMed ID: 15744014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Recognizing people from dynamic and static faces and bodies: dissecting identity with a fusion approach. O'Toole AJ; Phillips PJ; Weimer S; Roark DA; Ayyad J; Barwick R; Dunlop J Vision Res; 2011 Jan; 51(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 20969886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]