These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16489875)

  • 21. Assessment of patient satisfaction with various configurations of digital CROS and BiCROS hearing aids.
    Hill SL; Marcus A; Digges EN; Gillman N; Silverstein H
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2006 Jul; 85(7):427-30, 442. PubMed ID: 16909811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Education qualification levels and school careers of unilateral versus bilateral hearing aid users.
    Beijen J; Mylanus EA; Snik AF
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2007 Apr; 32(2):86-92. PubMed ID: 17403222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The objective and subjective evaluation of multichannel expansion in wide dynamic range compression hearing instruments.
    Plyler PN; Lowery KJ; Hamby HM; Trine TD
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Feb; 50(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 17344545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Test-retest reliability of in situ unaided thresholds in adults.
    Smith-Olinde L; Nicholson N; Chivers C; Highley P; Williams DK
    Am J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 15(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 16803794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Unaided and aided performance with a directional open-fit hearing aid.
    Valente M; Mispagel KM
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):329-36. PubMed ID: 18569105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A computer method for assessing satisfaction with hearing aids.
    Cienkowski KM; McHugh MS; McHugo GJ; Musiek FE; Cox RM; Baird JC
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Jul; 45(7):393-9. PubMed ID: 16938797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Latent demand for the bone-anchored hearing aid: the Lippy Group experience.
    Burkey JM; Berenholz LP; Lippy WH;
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):648-52. PubMed ID: 16868512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of the base line response on self-adjustments of hearing aid gain.
    Keidser G; Dillon H; Convery E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1668-81. PubMed ID: 19045657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
    Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.
    Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):421-34. PubMed ID: 18344870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Directivity of different hearing aid microphone locations.
    Olsen HL; Hagerman B
    Int J Audiol; 2002 Jan; 41(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 12467370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Factors affecting the use and perceived benefit of ITE and BTE hearing aids.
    Baumfield A; Dillon H
    Br J Audiol; 2001 Aug; 35(4):247-58. PubMed ID: 11694099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Hearing instruments for the elderly hearing impaired. A comparison of in-the-canal and behind-the-ear hearing instruments in first-time users.
    Tonning F; Warland A; Tonning K
    Scand Audiol; 1991; 20(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 1842272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The subjective evaluation of the expansion time constant in single-channel wide dynamic range compression hearing instruments.
    Plyler PN; Trine TD; Blair Hill A
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 45(6):331-6. PubMed ID: 16777779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The acceptance of background noise in adult cochlear implant users.
    Plyler PN; Bahng J; von Hapsburg D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Apr; 51(2):502-15. PubMed ID: 18367692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Probe-microphone measurements with body-worn instruments: loudspeaker and reference microphone effects.
    Nelson JA; Hawkins DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1994 Mar; 5(2):138-40. PubMed ID: 8180430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Hearing aid manipulation skills in an elderly population: a comparison of ITE, BTE, and ITC aids.
    Upfold LJ; May AE; Battaglia JA
    Br J Audiol; 1990 Oct; 24(5):311-8. PubMed ID: 2265301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Client-based adjustments of hearing aid gain: the effect of different control configurations.
    Dreschler WA; Keidser G; Convery E; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):214-27. PubMed ID: 18490863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Acceptance of noise growth patterns in hearing aid users.
    Freyaldenhoven MC; Plyler PN; Thelin JW; Muenchen RA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Feb; 51(1):126-35. PubMed ID: 18230860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The relationship between pre-fitting expectations and willingness to use hearing aids.
    Meister H; Walger M; Brehmer D; von Wedel UC; von Wedel H
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Apr; 47(4):153-9. PubMed ID: 18389410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.